Extended Abstracts of the 2011 International Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials 2011
DOI: 10.7567/ssdm.2011.e-8-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of sulfur treatment on HfO<sub>2</sub>/InGaAs MOS interfaces properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the recent reports have revealed that the surface roughness plays an important role in the electrical properties of InGaAs-OI MOSFETs 8) and that post deposition annealing after dielectric deposition and PMA also affect the InGaAs MOS interface properties. 15) Therefore, further improvements can be still expected through the InGaAs surface roughness reduction and the process optimization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the recent reports have revealed that the surface roughness plays an important role in the electrical properties of InGaAs-OI MOSFETs 8) and that post deposition annealing after dielectric deposition and PMA also affect the InGaAs MOS interface properties. 15) Therefore, further improvements can be still expected through the InGaAs surface roughness reduction and the process optimization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, these defects might be formed in the initial ALD steps through the oxidant exposure. Also, in Figure 9, we have benchmarked our results, comparing them to the best results ever reported in the field of III-V MOS device studies [56][57][58][59][60][61]. Extraordinary mid-gap D it values are achieved with low CET values with the proposed technology.…”
Section: Characterization Of Ipa-based Ald Hfo 2 On N-and P-type Ingamentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The Ga 2 O 3 passivation layer improved the Al 2 O 3 / InGaAs MIS interface properties by reducing the native oxide and terminating Ga 2 O 3 onto the surface. The combination of (NH 4 ) 2 S treatment and Ga 2 O 3 passivation layer revealed superior improvement of the Al 2 O 3 /InGaAs gate stack, which may be due to a reduction of D it both near the conduction band edge [4][5][6] and around the midgap in the Al 2 O 3 / InGaAs MIS structure, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The native oxide of III-V MIS generate defects in the form of As-As bonding and Ga dangling bonds, which causes a high interface trap density (D it ), and introduces strong Fermi-level pinning and severe deterioration of channel mobility. 1,2) Therefore, several oxide removal techniques such as aqueous HCl and NH 4 OH etching, 3) sulfur passivation, [4][5][6] selenium passivation, 7) self-cleaning with Al(CH 3 ) 3 (trimethylaluminum; TMA), [8][9][10][11][12] and H 2 plasma cleaning, 13) have been reported for the improvement of the GaAs and InGaAs channel properties. In addition to oxide removal, further surface passivation techniques such as plasma nitridation 14,15) and epitaxial Si passivation 16) have been proposed to control the anion composition at the MIS interface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%