2011
DOI: 10.3923/ijar.2011.143.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Sulphur on Yield and Quality of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
23
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
7
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest share of large tubers in the yield was found with the use of Polimag S (representing the amophoska group, and with the most Mg, S, Zn and B concentration) and Viking 13 (representing the nitrophoska group with Ca). The result showed that the Mg, S, Zn and B content of the soil can influence potato tuber size, which was confirmed by other authors (Bari et al, 2001;Sharma et al, 2011). Bari et al (2001) reported that Zn, S, Mg and B treatment produced a higher percentage of mediumsized and large-sized tubers, which agrees with the present results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The highest share of large tubers in the yield was found with the use of Polimag S (representing the amophoska group, and with the most Mg, S, Zn and B concentration) and Viking 13 (representing the nitrophoska group with Ca). The result showed that the Mg, S, Zn and B content of the soil can influence potato tuber size, which was confirmed by other authors (Bari et al, 2001;Sharma et al, 2011). Bari et al (2001) reported that Zn, S, Mg and B treatment produced a higher percentage of mediumsized and large-sized tubers, which agrees with the present results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The chemistry of K fertiliser had no effect on starch content in potato tubers of both cultivars (Table 3); this finding agrees with other findings from experiments with similar fertilisation (Westermann et al 1994;Sharma et al 2011), as well as with organic, biological and combined fertilisation (El-Sayed et al 2015).…”
Section: Starch Contentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This result is somewhat surprising as in our study sulphur as potassium sulphate was added at the rates ranging 12-62 kg S/ha, i.e. the rates shown earlier to increase potato yield (Chettri 2002;Sharma et al 2011;Barczak et al 2013), with some researchers, however, reporting decrease in potato yield already at 60 kg S/ha (Singh et al 2016). Tuber yield reduction by chloride was shown to be cultivar-and soil-dependent (van Loon & van der Berg 2003), being more pronounced in the sandy loam soil (similar to the one in our study) but not on the heavy clay soil.…”
Section: Tuber Yieldcontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eppendorfer and Eggum (1994) found severe reductions of these amino acids in potatoes suffering S deficiency. Sharma et al (2011) found increase in dry matter, specific gravity and starch content with increase in S supply. However, the authors determined the highest values with an S supply of 45 kg ha −1 .…”
Section: Sulphurmentioning
confidence: 83%