2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surface pattern formation on membrane fouling and its control in phase inversion process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest flux recovery obtained in CP10-5 membrane is also probably due to its smaller pore size, by which the large BSA molecules could not enter the small pore size, minimizing pore blockage phenomenon due to adsorption of BSA in the inner pores. As previously reported, factors such as membrane hydrophilicity, surface roughness and surface chemical composition are also the key parameters governing the severity of fouling [21,30,31]. Note the excellent fouling resistance of CP10-5 membrane is consistent with the high surface coverage of PVA shown by the membrane, which prevents protein adsorption and enhances fouling resistant.…”
Section: June 2015supporting
confidence: 59%
“…The highest flux recovery obtained in CP10-5 membrane is also probably due to its smaller pore size, by which the large BSA molecules could not enter the small pore size, minimizing pore blockage phenomenon due to adsorption of BSA in the inner pores. As previously reported, factors such as membrane hydrophilicity, surface roughness and surface chemical composition are also the key parameters governing the severity of fouling [21,30,31]. Note the excellent fouling resistance of CP10-5 membrane is consistent with the high surface coverage of PVA shown by the membrane, which prevents protein adsorption and enhances fouling resistant.…”
Section: June 2015supporting
confidence: 59%
“…It was also reported that there is a threshold concentration at which hydrophily shows a maximum [90,98,105]. The reason is that the surface roughness becomes dominant at higher additive concentration, which decreases the surface wettability [90].…”
Section: Downloaded By [Deakin University Library] At 01:21 12 Augustmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It was reported that water flux increased continuously by the incorporation of nanomaterials without any reduction within a range of concentrations, [39,85,90,96] which in one case, went up to 4.8 wt.% [96]. This behavior is attributed to the hydrophily enhancement and either increase in the surface roughness or membrane porosity.…”
Section: -Nanomaterials Incorporated Polymeric Membranes In Ultra Anmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Normalized flux was used to evaluate the antifouling performances of composite NF membrane [46][47][48][49]. The normalized flux was calculated by the following equation:…”
Section: Fouling Resistance Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%