42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2004
DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Surface Plasma Discharges on Boundary Layers at Mach 5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
33
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7c, the shock is observed to be present for images with the discharge in mode d and absent for images with discharge in mode c, indicating that for all conditions it is necessary for the discharge to remain in the relatively low power (10 W) diffuse mode d rather than the higher power (100 W) constricted mode c to produce a visible effect of plasma-flow actuation. This observation is also consistent with surface pressure measurements of Kimmel et al [5], who found that an increase of surface pressure just downstream of the cathode was much higher in the case of a lowcurrent diffuse discharge compared with a more constricted discharge at higher currents. Our observations were highly repeatable and were confirmed through multiple experimental runs.…”
Section: DC Plasma Discharge In Mach 285 Flowsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…7c, the shock is observed to be present for images with the discharge in mode d and absent for images with discharge in mode c, indicating that for all conditions it is necessary for the discharge to remain in the relatively low power (10 W) diffuse mode d rather than the higher power (100 W) constricted mode c to produce a visible effect of plasma-flow actuation. This observation is also consistent with surface pressure measurements of Kimmel et al [5], who found that an increase of surface pressure just downstream of the cathode was much higher in the case of a lowcurrent diffuse discharge compared with a more constricted discharge at higher currents. Our observations were highly repeatable and were confirmed through multiple experimental runs.…”
Section: DC Plasma Discharge In Mach 285 Flowsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Our observations were highly repeatable and were confirmed through multiple experimental runs. Therefore, based on our schlieren imaging evidence of a shock emerging from the discharge region and consistent observations on the surface pressures measured by Kimmel et al [5], we take the visible weak shock as measure of the effectiveness of plasma-flow interaction. We must also note that generation of discharge-induced flow actuation (discernible as shocks originating at the discharge location) has, however, been reported at much higher power (a few kilowatts) in filamentary arcs [22] where gas temperatures are high and dilatation effects are expected to be the only dominant mechanism of flow actuation in the absence of magnetic fields [5].…”
Section: DC Plasma Discharge In Mach 285 Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…His work was complemented by the numerical studies of El-Khabiry and Colver. 16 Recently Léger et al 17 and Kimmel et al 18 investigated and demonstrated the ability of corona discharges to reduce drag using electrodes perpendicular to the flow and either flush or in contact with a flat plate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%