2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0928-4931(02)00097-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surface topography and chemistry on adhesion, orientation and growth of fibroblasts on nickel–titanium substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
74
1
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
74
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…roughness) on material surfaces are also crucial in cell and tissue responses to biomaterials. Indeed, surface roughness has shown to alter fibroblast proliferation on aluminiun, titanium and titanium alloys substrates [60][61][62] , and strongly influence bacterial attachment to nitinol, titanium and glass surfaces [63][64][65][66] . Overall, the three functionalization strategies displayed the same value of R a (~ 30 nm; Table 2), slightly increasing the original R a of control samples (~ 25 nm; Table 2).…”
Section: Physicochemical Characterization Of the Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…roughness) on material surfaces are also crucial in cell and tissue responses to biomaterials. Indeed, surface roughness has shown to alter fibroblast proliferation on aluminiun, titanium and titanium alloys substrates [60][61][62] , and strongly influence bacterial attachment to nitinol, titanium and glass surfaces [63][64][65][66] . Overall, the three functionalization strategies displayed the same value of R a (~ 30 nm; Table 2), slightly increasing the original R a of control samples (~ 25 nm; Table 2).…”
Section: Physicochemical Characterization Of the Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ponsonnet et al 39 attributed the higher atomic ratio (0.25) of grade 2400 polished Nitinol to Ni diffusion to the surface during mechanical polishing. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the thicknesses of the oxide layers given in the literature for mechanically polished Nitinol vary in a wide range from 52 nm 40 to 5 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To summarize some of the major concerns related to the use of Nitinol one could cite aspects that seems to be related to the presence of Ni in the alloy composition and its influence beyond the TiO 2 barrier or its reliability as implant material due to: leaching of Ni iones [3,4], failure under cyclic deformations compared to other biomedical materials (Nitinol cracks at low stress intensity, and cracks propagate quickly [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], while clinical observational studies have shown a surprisingly high percentage of fracture in a variety of Nitinol devices [12][13][14][15][16][17][18], allergenic reactions in Ni hypersensitive patients [19][20][21][22], unfavorable healing processes (osteogenesis) compared to Stainless steels and Ti-based alloys [23], higher cell death rates [24], proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts on NiTi samples with rough surface is slow compared to stainless steels and Ti alloys with the same surface roughness [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%