2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surface treatment on adhesively bonded aluminium-aluminium joints regarding aeronautical structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these experimental results, clearly the chemically etched substrate promotes the higher bond strength than the as-received substrate (surface solely wiped with acetone, which is in good agreement with published literature on the effect of surface treatment on the shear strength of aluminum adhesive single-lap-joint in the past literature 30) .In their study, it was argued that the chemically treated of both aluminum substrate provides a higher ECA load of failure as compared to only one substrate is chemically treated 30) .…”
Section: Surfacesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on these experimental results, clearly the chemically etched substrate promotes the higher bond strength than the as-received substrate (surface solely wiped with acetone, which is in good agreement with published literature on the effect of surface treatment on the shear strength of aluminum adhesive single-lap-joint in the past literature 30) .In their study, it was argued that the chemically treated of both aluminum substrate provides a higher ECA load of failure as compared to only one substrate is chemically treated 30) .…”
Section: Surfacesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Overall, adhesive-cohesive failure mode of ECA exhibit higher shear strength as compared to adhesive failure mode, suggesting high adhesion strength between ECA/substrate interface as a result of large surface area of contact between epoxy/substrate interface, which yield in strong mechanical contact 29). Such observation is in agreement with the literature which studied the effect of surface treatment on adhesively bonded aluminium-aluminium joints which argued that the adhesive-cohesive failure showed higher failure loads as compared to those of adhesive type of failure 30) . Moreover, adhesive failure at high MWCNT filler loading suggest low mechanical interlocking strength between epoxy/substrate interface which can be attributed to the presence of large amount of MWCNT particles between epoxy/substrate interface, thus, induced to low surface area of contact between the epoxy/substrate interface.…”
Section: Lap Shear Testsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies have shown that the transition from adhesive failure to cohesive failure can greatly improve bond strength. 8,34 If there is a small/large amount of fibers torn in the composite and remaining on the metal surface, the failure mode is defined as light fiber tear/fiber tear failure. Finally, due to the insufficient strength of the metal, the failure occurs inside the metal rather than on the bonding surface, which is designated as stock brake failure.…”
Section: Failure Modes Of Lap Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main ways to improve the load-bearing capacity of composite-metal-bonded structures are to increase the lap size, select appropriate adhesives, and treat the surface. There are many surface treatment methods such as sanding, 3,4 sandblasting, [5][6][7] anodizing, 8,9 and chemical modification. 10 Although these methods have proven to have a positive effect on the interface shear strength, they are time-consuming and uncontrollable for regular geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%