Effect of Surface Treatment, Silane, and Universal Adhesive on Microshear Bond Strength of Nanofilled Composite Repairs

Fornazari, Isabelle Adad; Wille, I; Meda, EM; Brum, RT; Souza, EM

doi:10.2341/16-259-l

Cited by 67 publications

(83 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Seven different indirect substrates were considered in this review. These included lithium disilicate ceramic, 20,22,23,25,28‐39 yttrium‐stabilized zirconium dioxide ceramic, 20 ‐22, 24,27,32,37,40‐53 leucite‐reinforced ceramic, 20,54‐56 feldspathic porcelain, 32,59 polymer infiltrated ceramic material, 19,58 resin composite, 20,26,29,57,59‐66 and metal alloys 67–69 . The characteristics of these studies are summarized in Table 2.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bonding Strength of Universal Adhesives to Indirect Substrates: A Meta‐Analysis of in Vitro Studies

Cuevas‐Suárez

Rosa

Vitti

et al. 2020

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To evaluate the in vitro bond strength of universal adhesive systems to indirect substrates. Material and Methods: Two reviewers performed a literature search up to March 2018 in seven databases: PubMed, Web of Science, SciELO, Scopus, LILACS, IBECS, and BBO. The review included studies that compared the bond strength of universal adhesives and well-established material-specific primers to indirect substrates: lithium disilicate ceramic, yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide ceramic, leucite-reinforced ceramic, feldspathic porcelain, polymer infiltrated ceramic material, resin composite or metal alloys. Analyses were carried out using RevMan 5.3.5. A global comparison was performed with the standardized mean difference using a random-effects models at a significance level of p < 0.05. Results: A total of 45 studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and the meta-analysis was performed with 42 studies. Bond strength to glass-based ceramics and alloys was improved with the use of a specific-primer as separate step before the bonding procedures (lithium disilicate, p < 0.001; alloys, p < 0.001). The bond strength to zirconium substrates was improved with the use of universal adhesives (p < 0.001). For bond strength to composite resin as indirect substrate, universal adhesives performed in a manner similar to that of the material-specific primer (p = 0.11). Conclusions:The clinical procedure of luting zirconia and resin composite restorations could be simplified by using single-bottle universal adhesives. However, the ability of universal adhesives to achieve an adequate and durable bond to glass-based ceramics and alloys appears to be limited.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bonding Strength of Universal Adhesives to Indirect Substrates: A Meta‐Analysis of in Vitro Studies

Cuevas‐Suárez

Rosa

Vitti

et al. 2020

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…De acordo com Fornazari et al (2017), além dos problemas mais frequentes encontrados já citados anteriormente, as mudanças do pH, dieta e outros fatores, causam degradação da resina composta. Pode ser observado como consequência a descoloração, micro infiltrações, desgastes, estilhaçar e até fraturas da restauração (Özcan et al, 2007).…”

Section: 45unclassified

“…No caso de pequenos defeitos, como perda parcial da anatomia e descoloração extrínseca, pode-se optar pela não remoção total da restauração (Brum et al, 2017;Fornazari et al, 2017).…”

Section: 45unclassified

“…Nessas situações, um procedimento mais simples, como o reparo da restauração pode ser o tratamento mais apropriado, considerado minimamente invasivo, tão efetivo quanto a troca total da restauração, causando menor remoção de tecido sadio, aumentando a longevidade da restauração e reduzindo o risco de complicações do tratamento, a necessidade de anestesia local, o tempo operatório e o custo de todo o tratamento (Gordan et al, 2012;Lynch et al, 2013;Staxrud et al, 2016;Casagrande et al, 2017;Fornazari et al, 2017). Gordan et al (2014) A Odontologia Restauradora presume que a restauração dental é elaborada para devolver permanentemente a estrutura dental perdida, no entanto vários estudos têm apontado que a substituição tem sido vastamente executada.…”

Section: 45unclassified

“…Aproximadamente metade de todas as restaurações realizadas em adultos na prática odontológica tratam-se de substituições (Sharif et al, 2010;Heaven et al, 2013). Braga et al (2007) As restaurações diretas, assim como as restaurações indiretas, são susceptíveis a alterações e degradações dentro da cavidade bucal devido ao desgaste e ação química, além de apresentarem sítios de desenvolvimento de cáries secundárias (Gordan et al, 2006;Demarco et al, 2012;Fornazari et al, 2017). As pesquisas apontam que a cárie secundária acomete as margens adjacentes às restaurações sendo considerado o principal motivo para confecção de uma restauração (Gordan et al, 2002;Hickel et al, 2013;Fernandez et al, 2015).…”

Section: 45unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Análise da formação acadêmica e técnicas de reparos de restaurações pré-existentes na Rede de Atenção em Saúde Bucal

D'oro¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increasing demand for simplified and user-friendly adhesive systems has led to the development of a new class of adhesives termed as Universal Adhesives (UAs). The term "Universal" reflects manufacturers' claims that these adhesives can be applied with any adhesion strategy and offer the versatility of use with a variety of direct and indirect restorative materials. The aim of this review was to synthesize the literature regarding the current status of UAs, their adhesion potential to various substrates and their performance in different restorative situations. In vitro studies, clinical trials and systematic reviews were identified utilizing controlled vocabulary and keyword searches in Medline and EMBASE databases. About 282 studies (272 in vitro studies; 11 clinical studies) were included. Available laboratory and clinical evidence does not support the claim that UAs can be used with any adhesive strategy. Although, they can chemically bond to various tooth and direct/indirect restorative substrates, the stability of this bond is material-dependent and subject to hydrolytic degradation. Hence, additional measures are still needed to ensure long-term durability. which undermines the versatility of UAs. The lack of long-term data regarding the clinical performance of UAs further complicates clinical decision-making.

show abstract

Effect of Surface Treatment, Silane, and Universal Adhesive on Microshear Bond Strength of Nanofilled Composite Repairs

Cited by 67 publications

References 31 publications

Bonding Strength of Universal Adhesives to Indirect Substrates: A Meta‐Analysis of in Vitro Studies

Bonding Strength of Universal Adhesives to Indirect Substrates: A Meta‐Analysis of in Vitro Studies

Análise da formação acadêmica e técnicas de reparos de restaurações pré-existentes na Rede de Atenção em Saúde Bucal

Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About