2021
DOI: 10.1080/01932691.2021.1915157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surfactant crowding on clathrate hydrate growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the removal of additives from water after energy recovery remains an operational problem. Nevertheless, chemical additives are critical for developing hydrate-based technologies because these additives can lead to hydrate promotion or inhibition behaviors …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the removal of additives from water after energy recovery remains an operational problem. Nevertheless, chemical additives are critical for developing hydrate-based technologies because these additives can lead to hydrate promotion or inhibition behaviors …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, chemical additives are critical for developing hydrate-based technologies because these additives can lead to hydrate promotion or inhibition behaviors. 18 A few studies have shown that passive techniques such as electronucleation and metallic surfaces can promote the nucleation of hydrates. Acharya et al 19 demonstrated that aluminum metal reduces the induction time of hydrates, whereas copper and stainless steel surfaces do not contribute to the nucleation of hydrates.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commercial implementation of gas hydrate technology remains stalled due to the slow formation rate and low gas storage capacity of gas hydrates. Several strategies have been utilized to enhance the hydrate formation kinetics, such as surfactants [13,14] and nanoparticles [15]. Zhou et al [16] reported that the induction time was reduced by 80.8 % and gas consumption was increased by 12.8 % in the presence of graphite nanoparticles compared to pure water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%