2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2017.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of surfactant on emulsification in microchannels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a comprehensive study of other surfactants with different CMC values and in a range of concentrations is required to make more general conclusions on the effect of surfactant on the film thickness. It can be suggested from the discussion above that if an increase in the film thickness is due to depletion of surfactant from the leading edge of displacing liquid then using slower equilibrating surfactants, such as Triton X‐100 or hexadecytrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) should result in further decrease of film thickness, whereas increase in concentration of SDS or other quickly equilibrated surfactant (e.g., dodecyltrimethylammonum bromide)will eventually increase the film thickness back to the value expected for the capillary number based on surface tension of surfactant solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, a comprehensive study of other surfactants with different CMC values and in a range of concentrations is required to make more general conclusions on the effect of surfactant on the film thickness. It can be suggested from the discussion above that if an increase in the film thickness is due to depletion of surfactant from the leading edge of displacing liquid then using slower equilibrating surfactants, such as Triton X‐100 or hexadecytrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) should result in further decrease of film thickness, whereas increase in concentration of SDS or other quickly equilibrated surfactant (e.g., dodecyltrimethylammonum bromide)will eventually increase the film thickness back to the value expected for the capillary number based on surface tension of surfactant solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic surface tension values are used to estimate the dynamic interfacial tension between the displaced fluid and the displacing fluid with SDS added, following the strategy below, which was proposed recently γ0γsσ0σs=γ0γstσ0σst …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Web of Science, the number of articles published on flow-focusing microfluidics over the last 2 years was four and ten times larger than for T-junction and co-flow designs, respectively. Flow focusing can be achieved in various ways: by interaction of the flows of dispersed and continuous phases in a cross-junction (hydrodynamic focusing) (Cubaud and Mason 2008;Carrier et al 2015;Chen et al 2015), by passing coflowing dispersed and continuous phases through an orifice (geometrical focusing) (Anna et al 2003;Garstecki et al 2005;Lee et al 2009), by combination of hydrodynamic and geometrical focusing (Ward et al 2010;Kovalchuk et al 2018b) or by optical focusing (de Saint Vincent and Delville 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow-focusing devices produce drops in four different regimes which are denoted as squeezing, dripping, jetting and tip streaming (Anna and Mayer 2006;Cubaud and Mason 2008;Lee et al 2009;Kovalchuk et al 2018b). The squeezing regime usually results in the formation of plugs with a length larger than the channel width whilst smaller drops are formed in the dripping regime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This bubble formation problem was not observed when D-PBS(-) was used. This is related to the innate characteristic of a surfactant-containing solution that forms a thin plug deposit in a microchannel as a trailing film under low pressure [44]. As for the percentage of microwells containing single trapped bead, a decreasing trend with increasing sheet thickness (30 µm: 31%, 60 µm: 29% and 90 µm: 22%) was observed as shown in Figure 4b.…”
Section: Neutrophil Isolation Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 77%