2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/9062649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Surfactants on Gas Holdup in Shear-Thinning Fluids

Abstract: In this study, the gas holdup of bubble swarms in shear-thinning fluids was experimentally studied at superficial gas velocities ranging from 0.001 to 0.02 m⋅s −1 . Carboxylmethyl cellulose (CMC) solutions of 0.2 wt%, 0.6 wt%, and 1.0 wt% with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as the surfactant were used as the power-law (liquid phase), and nitrogen was used as the gas phase. Effects of SDS concentration, rheological behavior, and physical properties of the liquid phase and superficial gas velocity on gas holdup we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 summarizes two recognized effects of adding surface‐active substances in a gas–liquid two‐phase flow. The surface‐active substances reduce the mobility of the gas–liquid interface and inhibit bubble coalescence, thus increasing the gas holdup and mass transfer area, in an effect called the “Marangoni effect.” 10,11 According to our previous work, the bubble coalescence time in a surfactant‐water system controlled by the Marangoni effect can be thousands of times larger than that in a pure water system, due to the significant effect of surfactants on hydrodynamics and mass transfer 12,13 . The other recognized effect is the increased drag force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1 summarizes two recognized effects of adding surface‐active substances in a gas–liquid two‐phase flow. The surface‐active substances reduce the mobility of the gas–liquid interface and inhibit bubble coalescence, thus increasing the gas holdup and mass transfer area, in an effect called the “Marangoni effect.” 10,11 According to our previous work, the bubble coalescence time in a surfactant‐water system controlled by the Marangoni effect can be thousands of times larger than that in a pure water system, due to the significant effect of surfactants on hydrodynamics and mass transfer 12,13 . The other recognized effect is the increased drag force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…10,11 According to our previous work, the bubble coalescence time in a surfactant-water system controlled by the Marangoni effect can be thousands of times larger than that in a pure water system, due to the significant effect of surfactants on hydrodynamics and mass transfer. 12,13 The other recognized effect is the increased drag force. The adsorbed surfactant molecules are swept to the trailing pole of a rising bubble and create the Marangoni stress at the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 6,23 ] The bubble number density and hydrodynamics are influenced by the gas flow rate. [ 11 ] Li et al [ 24 ] found the gas holdup to be directly proportional to Ug and the concentration of aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) solution. Anastasiou et al [ 4 ] used CFD and reported bubble cluster formation at lower velocities and the onset of the heterogeneous regime with bubble coalescence at higher velocities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xing et al [ 31 ] used the population balance model (PBM) and found that bubble Sauter mean diameter (SMD) was overpredicted because the liquid viscosity affected breakage models more than the coalescence models. Li et al [ 24 ] observed a lower gas holdup with an increase in the shear‐thinning property of the liquid. Moreover, the gas holdup increased with liquid viscosity due to the reduction in bubble rise velocity and the consequential increase in bubble residence time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation