2012
DOI: 10.1002/app.36487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of talc on thermal stability and flame retardancy of polycarbonate/PSBPBP composite

Abstract: A novel flame retardant poly(3-aminopropyl methylsiloxane bis(3-hydroxy phenyl spirocyclic pentaerythritol bisphosphate)) (PSBPBP) in combination with talc was blended into polycarbonate (PC) by melt compounding. The flame retardancy and thermal stability of PC/PSBPBP/talc composites were investigated by limiting oxygen index (LOI) test, UL-94 rating test, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Raman spectroscopy (RS), and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The mechanical properties were also measured in this work… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pyrolytic PO 4 Á can capture active free radicals (H˙and OH˙) in the flame zone, thus terminating further burning. 39,40 In contrast, the relative peak intensity of benzylidene (m/z = 91) are more obvious in mass spectrum of UPR-0, while UPR-1 and UPR-2 have the relatively high peak intensities of benzene (m/z = 77) and phthalic anhydride (m/z = 148). This declares the flameretardant phosphatized unsaturated polyester resins have the different pyrolysis processe compared to UPR-0.…”
Section: Thermal Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pyrolytic PO 4 Á can capture active free radicals (H˙and OH˙) in the flame zone, thus terminating further burning. 39,40 In contrast, the relative peak intensity of benzylidene (m/z = 91) are more obvious in mass spectrum of UPR-0, while UPR-1 and UPR-2 have the relatively high peak intensities of benzene (m/z = 77) and phthalic anhydride (m/z = 148). This declares the flameretardant phosphatized unsaturated polyester resins have the different pyrolysis processe compared to UPR-0.…”
Section: Thermal Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity ratio of D to G was relevant to the microcrystal size of the char layer. Higher I D /I G value means a smaller carbonaceous structure of char residue, indirectly committing to better flame retardance 34. In detail, the I D /I G value for pure PET was 1.21, whereas the PET/FR5.0 nanocomposite displayed a higher I D / I G value (2.43), almost two times as much.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It implied a reduction of degradation rate in glass bead‐filled RPET composites. The potential of fillers for improving thermal stability was reported in the composites of filler and flame retardant‐filled polycarbonate and polyamide …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential of fillers for improving thermal stability was reported in the composites of filler and flame retardant-filled polycarbonate and polyamide. [19,20] Thermal degradation temperature was determined from temperature at 5% of weight loss (T d5 ) and 50% of weight loss (T d50 ). Degradation temperature (T d5 ) of RPET was unchanged when filled with glass bead and talc as tabulated in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%