2023
DOI: 10.1121/10.0016866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of telepractice on pediatric cochlear implant users and provider vowel space: A preliminary report

Abstract: Clear speaking styles are goal-oriented modifications in which talkers adapt acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech to compensate for communication challenges. Do children with hearing loss and a clinical provider modify speech characteristics during telepractice to adjust for remote communication? The study examined the effect of telepractice (tele-) on vowel production in seven (mean age 4:11 years, SD 1:2 years) children with cochlear implants (CIs) and a provider. The first (F1) and second (F2) forman… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 118 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a limitation in that this excluded a number of observational studies that have evaluated telehealth service delivery and show positive outcomes in populations frequently seen by speech language pathologists including aphasia, primary progressive aphasia and cognitive-communication disorders, were excluded from the review. (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) On the other hand, the restriction of includable studies is a strength in terms of allowing the meta-analyses to have been conducted. The study also excluded studies that provided asynchronous treatment, which excluded trials comparing face to face with asynchronous treatment modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a limitation in that this excluded a number of observational studies that have evaluated telehealth service delivery and show positive outcomes in populations frequently seen by speech language pathologists including aphasia, primary progressive aphasia and cognitive-communication disorders, were excluded from the review. (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) On the other hand, the restriction of includable studies is a strength in terms of allowing the meta-analyses to have been conducted. The study also excluded studies that provided asynchronous treatment, which excluded trials comparing face to face with asynchronous treatment modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%