1990
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(90)90070-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of temperature and ph on the effective maximum specific growth rate of nitrifying bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
97
1
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
9
97
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Villaverde [44] observed that nitrification efficiency increased linearly by 13% per pH unit within a pH range between 5.0 and 9.0 with the highest activity of ammonium oxidizers at 8.2. Similar observations were made by Antoniou et al [45], who report the overall nitrification pH of approximately 7.8. There are three major bacteria, for which optimal pH conditions are as follows: (1) Nitrobacter: 7.5 [46]; (2) Nitrosomonas: 7.0-7.5 [47], and (3) Nitrospira: 8.0-8.3 [48].…”
Section: Ph Stabilizationsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Villaverde [44] observed that nitrification efficiency increased linearly by 13% per pH unit within a pH range between 5.0 and 9.0 with the highest activity of ammonium oxidizers at 8.2. Similar observations were made by Antoniou et al [45], who report the overall nitrification pH of approximately 7.8. There are three major bacteria, for which optimal pH conditions are as follows: (1) Nitrobacter: 7.5 [46]; (2) Nitrosomonas: 7.0-7.5 [47], and (3) Nitrospira: 8.0-8.3 [48].…”
Section: Ph Stabilizationsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Villaverde (1997) observed that nitrification efficiency increased linearly by 13% per pH unit within a pH range between 5.0 and 9.0 with the highest activity of ammonium oxidizers at 8.2. Similar observations were made by Antoniou et al (1990), who report the overall nitrification pH of approximately 7.8. There are three major bacteria, for which optimal pH conditions are as follows: (1) Nitrobacter: 7.5 (Keen and Prosser, 1987); (2) Nitrosomonas: 7.0-7.5 (Hatayama et al, 2000), and (3) Nitrospira: 8.0-8.3 (Blackburne et al, 2007).…”
Section: Ph Stabilizationsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Corroborating this behavior are low nitrogen removal efficiencies at a salt concentration of 1 and 2%, nitrate accumulation and NO 2 --N formation under low DO concentrations. Nitrite accumulation has shown to cause a toxic effect linked to pH effects on biomass, specifically ammonia oxidizers (Antoniou et al, 1990;Moussa et al, 2003). This decreased nitrogen removal profiles have caused a significant impact on the networks generalization pattern while mapping these variables.…”
Section: Network Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%