2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of temperature and solids retention time on the removal of antibiotic resistance genes during anaerobic digestion of sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows the content of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N), as well as the C/N ratio for each of the nine analyzed samples. Although the vast majority of researchers concludes that the optimal C/N ratio must be between 20 and 30, there are researchers who demonstrated that good results can be obtained with a lower C/N ratio (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) [27, 29, and 39]. Following a sequence of 3 repeated analyses on the same species (for which the arithmetic mean is representative), one found; the C/N ratio for pig manure ranges between 6.8 and 16.7, for cow manure between 16.5 and 30.2, for chicken manure it is 6.7, for ostrich manure 15.3, and for horse manure 22.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 shows the content of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N), as well as the C/N ratio for each of the nine analyzed samples. Although the vast majority of researchers concludes that the optimal C/N ratio must be between 20 and 30, there are researchers who demonstrated that good results can be obtained with a lower C/N ratio (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) [27, 29, and 39]. Following a sequence of 3 repeated analyses on the same species (for which the arithmetic mean is representative), one found; the C/N ratio for pig manure ranges between 6.8 and 16.7, for cow manure between 16.5 and 30.2, for chicken manure it is 6.7, for ostrich manure 15.3, and for horse manure 22.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature is one of the primary operating parameters [19] (p. 101377), having the ability to influence the rate of microbial growth and degradation of organic matter [20] (p. e11174). Low temperature reduces the performance of the anaerobic digestion process [21] (p. 135808), whereas variable temperature can affect the metabolic activity of methanogens, affecting methane production [22] (p. 128054).…”
Section: Factors Influencing Anaerobic Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…sulI and tetM enriched in mesophilic AD Zhang et al ( 2015 ) Pig manure Thermophilic AD at 55 °C and mesophilic AD at 35 °C for 25 days. Then, H 2 was added to reactors 5 drug classes Addition of H 2 did not affect mesophilic AD, but in thermophilic AD, increased number of macrolides, glycopeptide, lincosamide, and fluoroquinolone genes Zhu et al ( 2021b ) Sludge Psychrophilic AD at 15 °C and mesophilic AD at 35 °C for 35 days 14 ARG types Psychrophilic AD performed better in the absence of oxytetracycline Yun et al ( 2021 ) Cattle manure Solid-state thermophilic AD at 55 °C, mesophilic AD at 35 °C and liquid AD at 35 °C 20 ARG types Mesophilic solid-state achieved most reduction than other treatments Sun et al ( 2019c ) Sewage sludge Mesophilic AD for 60 and 109 days 11 ARG types Shorter SRT improved ARGs reduction in single-stage and two-stage digestion Zhang et al ( 2019b ) Sewage sludge Mesophilic and thermophilic AD at different SRTs of 20, 30, and 40 days Sul1 , sul2 , tetW , tetX , tetA , ermF , aac(6′)-lb , intl1 , intl2 , tnpA Higher removal of ARGs was achieved in long SRTs in mesophilic AD while thermophilic AD removed more ARGs in short SRTs Mortezaei et al ( 2023 ) …”
Section: Factors Affecting the Fate Of Args In Ad Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the results, macrolide resistance genes could be eliminated in shorter SRT, but longer SRT was required to eliminate sulfonamides and tetracycline resistance genes. Recently, Mortezaei et al ( 2023 ) studied the effect of temperature and SRT on the attenuation of ARGs and MGEs. The results showed that thermophilic AD outperformed (75.8% removal efficiency) mesophilic AD in short SRTs (20 days) whereas in longer SRTs (30 and 40 days) mesophilic AD performed better than thermophilic AD.…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Fate Of Args In Ad Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%