1960
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/53.5.691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Temperature on the Rate of Development of Lygus Lineolaris (Hemiptera: Miridae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
8
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At these latter temperatures mortality also tended to occur during or within 48 h of molting as was observed at 10 and 37.8ЊC. High mortality at low and high temperature was reported previously for L. hesperus (Champlain and Butler 1967) and L. elisus (Bommireddy et al 2004) nymphs molting to adults, and for hatching eggs of L. lineolaris (Ridgway and Gyrisco 1960). Potentially, Lygus nymphs are more susceptible to desiccation during ecdysis and at temperature extremes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…At these latter temperatures mortality also tended to occur during or within 48 h of molting as was observed at 10 and 37.8ЊC. High mortality at low and high temperature was reported previously for L. hesperus (Champlain and Butler 1967) and L. elisus (Bommireddy et al 2004) nymphs molting to adults, and for hatching eggs of L. lineolaris (Ridgway and Gyrisco 1960). Potentially, Lygus nymphs are more susceptible to desiccation during ecdysis and at temperature extremes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Nymphal developmental times of 2.55, 3.61, 3.36, 3.61, and 4.00 d (instars ÞrstÐÞfth, respectively) on green beans were similar to those reported by Butler and Wardecker (1971) for L. hesperus (2.8, 2.6, 3.0, 3.6 and 5.2 at 25ЊC; 2.4, 2.0, 2.2, 2.8 and 3.9 (instars Þrst-Þfth, respectively) at 30ЊC. Similar results were reported for L. lineolaris (Ridgway and Gyrisco 1960) and L. elisus (Bommireddy et al 2004). Although there were some slight differences between different development stages, the total nymphal development of L. lineolaris was Ϸ17 d at 27ЊC (Fleischer andGaylor 1988, Snodgrass andMcWilliams 1992), very similar to what we found in L. hesperus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The total nymphal developmental time in green bean was 17.1 d at 27ЊC. These results were similar to a predicted developmental time obtained using a simple linear model constructed using data from the literature [17.2 d at 25ЊC for L. hesperus (Butler and Wardecker 1971), 13.6 d at 28ЊC for L. lineolaris (Khattat and Stewart 1977), 19.7 d at 25ЊC for L. lineolaris (Ridgway and Gyrisco 1960), and 20.7 d at 25ЊC and 14.3 d at 30ЊC for L. elisus (Bommireddy et al 2004)]. This analysis produced the equation: y ϭ Ϫ1.579x ϩ 47.907, with a moderately respectable R 2 of 0.71 and a marginally signiÞcant test for slope (P ϭ 0.07).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…If soybeans were a good host, third instars could have been found in the sleeve cages after the 16-to 18-d periods in which the females were caged on the plants. If eggs were laid in soybeans on the Þrst day the females were placed in the cages, they would require an average 7.6 d to hatch at 25ЊC and 6.7 d at 30ЊC (Ridgway and Gyrisco 1960). Thus, if 7Ð 8 d for egg hatch occurred in the cages, there would have been an 8-to 10-d period for the development of nymphs in the cages before they were removed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ensured that most females were mated and ready to lay eggs when sleeve cages were infested. Mating of adults occurs between 4 and 6 d after becoming adults (Bariola 1969), and females have a preoviposition period of 8 d before they lay eggs (Ridgway and Gyrisco 1960). The adults were left in the cages in the Þeld for 16 d (17 June to 3 July 2005) on the preblooming soybean varieties in test 1.…”
Section: Commercialmentioning
confidence: 99%