1966
DOI: 10.1007/bf00714989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of test piece length on the fatigue strength of steel in air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the samples tested in RB had a gauge of 6 mm in diameter and 25 mm in length, whereas the TC ones had a diameter of 9 mm with a length of 12.5 mm. Pogorestskii et al [35] showed that, for 40Kh steel loaded in four-point rotating-bending, larger gauge length and diameter had a detrimental effect on the fatigue limit, and they defined two different coefficients: −0.18 MPa/mm for the length and −4.4 MPa/mm for the radius. If similar behavior can be considered for the 304L stainless steel, an increase of 3 mm in diameter and a decrease of 12.5 mm in length would result in an overall decrease of approximately 5 MPa for the RB fatigue limit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the samples tested in RB had a gauge of 6 mm in diameter and 25 mm in length, whereas the TC ones had a diameter of 9 mm with a length of 12.5 mm. Pogorestskii et al [35] showed that, for 40Kh steel loaded in four-point rotating-bending, larger gauge length and diameter had a detrimental effect on the fatigue limit, and they defined two different coefficients: −0.18 MPa/mm for the length and −4.4 MPa/mm for the radius. If similar behavior can be considered for the 304L stainless steel, an increase of 3 mm in diameter and a decrease of 12.5 mm in length would result in an overall decrease of approximately 5 MPa for the RB fatigue limit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, consider the pure size effect through constant moment tests on samples of the same material, bending moment and radius -i.e. the same nominal maximum stress σ and stress gradient, but different lengths (data of [14], represented by [7]). As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation is that the number of imposed load cycles was not sufficiently large to impose the elastic shakedown state. Considering the experimental results of [15,17], the fatigue limit for alternating shear was considered to be the shear yield limit of the weakest grain. As a consequence the fatigue limits for alternating shear is given by the following relation:…”
Section: Adaptation Of the Dang Van Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%