2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of textured foot orthotics on static and dynamic postural stability in middle-aged females

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
64
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
64
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the results of studies analyzing the effects of footwear on the COP excursion are inconsistent. Some studies report differences in quiet stance COP excursions between barefoot and shod standing (Brenton-Rule et al 2011) or between different types of footwear (Lord et al 1999), while several other studies found no significant difference between barefoot and shod conditions Bashford 1996, Landry et al 2010) or between different types of footwear (Lindemann et al 2003, Whitney and Wrisley 2004, Van Geffen et al 2007, Wilson et al 2008, Brenton-Rule et al 2011. Only for "extreme" cases of footwear, quiet stance experiments have been able to conclusively document an effect on the postural control system, for instance, for high heeled shoes (Menant et al 2008) or for so called "unstable" shoes, such as the MBT TM shoe (Masai Barefoot Technology Inc., Switzerland) which creates increased instability through a rocker sole and a soft heel pad (Nigg et al 2006a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the results of studies analyzing the effects of footwear on the COP excursion are inconsistent. Some studies report differences in quiet stance COP excursions between barefoot and shod standing (Brenton-Rule et al 2011) or between different types of footwear (Lord et al 1999), while several other studies found no significant difference between barefoot and shod conditions Bashford 1996, Landry et al 2010) or between different types of footwear (Lindemann et al 2003, Whitney and Wrisley 2004, Van Geffen et al 2007, Wilson et al 2008, Brenton-Rule et al 2011. Only for "extreme" cases of footwear, quiet stance experiments have been able to conclusively document an effect on the postural control system, for instance, for high heeled shoes (Menant et al 2008) or for so called "unstable" shoes, such as the MBT TM shoe (Masai Barefoot Technology Inc., Switzerland) which creates increased instability through a rocker sole and a soft heel pad (Nigg et al 2006a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several pathways of how footwear might influence the postural control system. Footwear might change a) the position and posture of the feet (Shultz et al in press), the pressure distribution at the foot during the ground contact (Shorten 2009), and/or it may affect several sensory systems that contribute to the postural control (Magnusson et al 1990, Robbins and Waked 1997, Maki et al 1999, Patel et al 2008, Wilson et al 2008, Hatton et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Lord et al [9] reported that COP during static standing differed with different types of shoes; however, Wilson et al [10] and Brenton-Rule et al [11] sole angle affects COP during static standing. Hence, the above, in short, the shoes with the different sole round angle would be necessary to examine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the condition of eye closed test, the CoP trajectory increased profoundly, although the faller group was larger than non-fall but was not significant. The increased of M-L sway implies the increase of fall risk, the poor vision condition elevated the falling rate 12,13 . With orthoses, the sway trajectory reduced, among that the Proactive insole (arch height 1.75cm) showed the best posture stability control.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%