1993
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1993.17.3.149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the Aircast on Unilateral Postural Control: Amplitude and Frequency Variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding of decreased COP displacement in the M-L direction during external ankle support is comparable a previous finding that M-L postural sway was reduced when normal subjects performed a single leg stance with a semirigid, stirrup-type brace 42) . Those subjects showed increased postural control, which was manifested as a decrease in the amplitude of postural sway when compared to the no ankle external support condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The finding of decreased COP displacement in the M-L direction during external ankle support is comparable a previous finding that M-L postural sway was reduced when normal subjects performed a single leg stance with a semirigid, stirrup-type brace 42) . Those subjects showed increased postural control, which was manifested as a decrease in the amplitude of postural sway when compared to the no ankle external support condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Whereas in older people and those with disabilities JPS plays a greater role. Evidence is available about the immediate effects of an appliance providing compression at the ankle on JPS and balance [9][10][11][12][13]. However, these studies were on healthy young people or young athletes with ankle instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The application of ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) and compression of the ankle and foot have been shown to have an association with improvement of ankle JPS [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Due to compression, additional feedback from mechanoreceptors in the skin could contribute to the improvement in JPS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is not only limited to vigourous activity, but occurs in daily activities such as walking. There is a large body of literature in which the effects of various prophylactic ankle supports on variables such as ankle range of motion [2], ankle muscle strength [4,24], reflex and voluntary reaction time [13,19], postural steadiness [5,9] and functional performance tasks [7] have been reported. Normal foot biomechanics during the stance phase has been thoroughly studied [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%