2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2011.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the angle of attack on the wind convection coefficient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 3 shows that the use of chicanes as artificial roughness influence significantly on the temperature field, as noted by Aoues et al [11], Mahboub et al [12]. For mass flow rate of 0.035 kg/s, it is observed that the air temperature increasing along the air stream dynamics length with a mean of (316.3 K) in the smooth case and with an average of (324.3 K, 329.5 K, 330.7 K and 332.1 K) in the case (without inclined part, 0°, 45° and 60°) with a rise of (2.52%, 4.17%, 4.55% and 4.99%)respectively.…”
Section: Reynolds Number Effect On the Heat Transfer Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fig. 3 shows that the use of chicanes as artificial roughness influence significantly on the temperature field, as noted by Aoues et al [11], Mahboub et al [12]. For mass flow rate of 0.035 kg/s, it is observed that the air temperature increasing along the air stream dynamics length with a mean of (316.3 K) in the smooth case and with an average of (324.3 K, 329.5 K, 330.7 K and 332.1 K) in the case (without inclined part, 0°, 45° and 60°) with a rise of (2.52%, 4.17%, 4.55% and 4.99%)respectively.…”
Section: Reynolds Number Effect On the Heat Transfer Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For mass flow rate of 0.035 kg/s, it is observed that the air temperature increasing along the air stream dynamics length with a mean of (316.3 K) in the smooth case and with an average of (324.3 K, 329.5 K, 330.7 K and 332.1 K) in the case (without inclined part, 0°, 45° and 60°) with a rise of (2.52%, 4.17%, 4.55% and 4.99%)respectively. This is due to the secondary flow when it is trapped between two chicanes and the main flow where powered with a brewing phenomenon which provokes a heat transfer from the hot flow to the cold one, therefore the chicanes provide a delaying aspect for more and more time to the heat transfer process which is confirmed by Moummi et al [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. …”
Section: Reynolds Number Effect On the Heat Transfer Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…X=0°, 15°, 30°,45°,60°,75° Comparative result analysis has been done for finned heat sink block with flat plate CFD analysis and experimentation and analytical approach by authors [12][13][14]. It shows that finned block heat sink has a similar behavior to a flat plate under a different angle of attack.…”
Section: Effect Of Ambient Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present investigation, 4 TEGs (each 40 mm × 40 mm and 3 mm thick) having total power generation capacity of 1.6 W (0.4×4)under a flux of 20,000 W/m 2 [12], are placed in contact in 2×2 configuration within an 80 mm × 80 mm and 2 mm deep machined slot on a 100 mm × 100 mm and 20 mm thick aluminum block which is used as target or spreader. Another aluminum block (base plate) of 100 mm × 100 mm and 20 mm thick is placed over the TEGs upon which 8 rectangular plate fins are attached each having a thickness of 1 mm and length and height as 80 mm and 60 mm respectively.…”
Section: Setup and Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation