2011
DOI: 10.1002/app.34854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the introduction of polydimethylsiloxane on the foaming behavior of block‐copolymerized polypropylene

Abstract: We investigated the effect of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) on the foaming properties of block-copolymerized polypropylene (B-PP) by blending different contents of PDMS with B-PP in the extrusion process using supercritical CO 2 as the blowing agent. The experimental results indicate that the addition of PDMS greatly increased the expansion ratio of the foamed samples. At the same time, the cell population density of foams obtained from the blends also increased to a certain degree and provided a new perspective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to its very advantageous price and excellent mechanical properties, the foaming of PP with supercritical CO 2 has been widely studied; however, good foaming can only be achieved using PP with the appropriate degree of crystallinity and melt strength . To select an appropriate polymer matrix, the foaming of two different PPs, differing in their crystallinity degree ( χ ) and melting temperature ( T m ), was realized and compared (Figure ; PP1 with T m = 165 °C and χ = 42.6%; PP2 with T m = 137 °C and χ = 18.3%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its very advantageous price and excellent mechanical properties, the foaming of PP with supercritical CO 2 has been widely studied; however, good foaming can only be achieved using PP with the appropriate degree of crystallinity and melt strength . To select an appropriate polymer matrix, the foaming of two different PPs, differing in their crystallinity degree ( χ ) and melting temperature ( T m ), was realized and compared (Figure ; PP1 with T m = 165 °C and χ = 42.6%; PP2 with T m = 137 °C and χ = 18.3%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For details of the method, see ref. . Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to characterize the cell morphology of the foamed samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density of the foamed samples was determined by the buoyancy method. For details of the method, see reference [6]. SEM was used to characterize cell morphology of the foamed samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%