2017
DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2017.1396380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the joint type on the bearing capacity of a multi–drum column under static load

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is issue was investigated by Buzov et al [13] for static loads. e height of the columns was approximately 1200 mm, and their slenderness l was approximately 35. e mass at the top of the column (m 500 kg), which is centrally positioned in relation to its axis, was formed from a rigid concrete block with dimensions of 0.8 × 0.8 × 0.33 m.…”
Section: Tested Columnsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is issue was investigated by Buzov et al [13] for static loads. e height of the columns was approximately 1200 mm, and their slenderness l was approximately 35. e mass at the top of the column (m 500 kg), which is centrally positioned in relation to its axis, was formed from a rigid concrete block with dimensions of 0.8 × 0.8 × 0.33 m.…”
Section: Tested Columnsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…e blocks were made of concrete with a compressive strength of 53.55 MPa, obtained on the cylinder according to [14]. Although the subject of this study is stone columns, concrete blocks were used instead of stone blocks for several reasons [13,15]: (i) unreliability of the uniformity of the stone quality (the probable presence of anomalies in the stone), (ii) great similarity of stone and concrete properties (arti cial stone), (iii) low level of maximum stress in the blocks (the collapse of a column is due to the loss of its stability), and (iv) lower research costs. is approach did not greatly inuence the given conclusions of this study.…”
Section: Tested Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, studies on vertical displacement have been limited in civil engineering to structural elements, with regard to the lift-slab technology [29,30]. The issue of stability of the reinforced concrete columns being compressed was mainly addressed in the investigations [31,32], where the effect of elements forming the stack on its bearing capacity was examined. Moreover, the investigations of eccentrically loaded walls with the filled joints [33] and of masonry structures with dry contacts points are known [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bearing capacity of a stack of defined height was demonstrated to decrease along with an increasing number of elements forming that stack [ 5 ]. The test described in the paper [ 6 ] found that reduced transverse strain in elements of the stack increased its bearing capacity. It was demonstrated in the paper [ 7 ] that supporting surfaces of the stack element should be inclined at the angle narrower than 30 degrees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%