2018
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/aade0c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the magnetic field and current orientation on the splashing of liquid metal free surface of fusion reactor PFCs

Abstract: In future tokamak nuclear fusion devices, the development of suitable plasma facing materials is considered to be one of the great challenges. Liquid metal, instead of conventional solid materials, has been proposed as a potential solution to plasma facing components (PFCs) for future nuclear fusion reactors, and it can solve the problems that most fusion reactors are facing. The splashing of liquid metal into the fusion plasma is a big problem because of the implementation of liquid metal PFCs in fusion react… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this time, the thickness of the liquid film is about to exceed the sidewall of the flow channel, so the enlargement of the current intensity had no choice but to stop. Compared with the effect of current on the liquid metal under the condition of the insulating wall [14], the liquid metal on the conductive wall has higher stability, the height and diameter of the liquid column are more stable, and it is unlikely to produce splashed droplets. On the one hand, the conductivity of the conductive wall is equivalent to that of the fluid, so part of the current will flow through the conductive wall, as a result, the current flowing through the fluid is smaller.…”
Section: The Free Surface Flow Under Combined Action Of the Magnetic ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At this time, the thickness of the liquid film is about to exceed the sidewall of the flow channel, so the enlargement of the current intensity had no choice but to stop. Compared with the effect of current on the liquid metal under the condition of the insulating wall [14], the liquid metal on the conductive wall has higher stability, the height and diameter of the liquid column are more stable, and it is unlikely to produce splashed droplets. On the one hand, the conductivity of the conductive wall is equivalent to that of the fluid, so part of the current will flow through the conductive wall, as a result, the current flowing through the fluid is smaller.…”
Section: The Free Surface Flow Under Combined Action Of the Magnetic ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results show that the critical current decreases with increasing magnetic field strength. Dimensionless Lorentz force of the critical current density for the splashing is calculated by the multiple linear regression [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results indicate that magnetic damping vigorously hinders the flow of liquid metal. Wang et al 8 investigated the effect of current and magnetic field orientation on free surface instability and splashing of liquid metal PFC. In summary, magnetic damping remarkably changes the flow pattern of liquid metal, especially under a strong magnetic field environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They could be also resistant to neutron radiation owing to their liquid nature and the reduction of thermal stress in the solid parts of the component [5]. However, when working as a PFM, very high plasma currents through LMs in a strong magnetic field, as is present in fusion tokamaks, can produce magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) effects and cause liquid splashing from the surface [6][7][8][9][10]. In particular, plasma disruptions and edge-localized modes (ELMs) increase the current density in the liquid and can cause Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) [11] and Rayleigh-Taylor (RT) [12] instabilities [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%