2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2004.12.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the metal precursor on the surface site distribution of Al2O3-supported Ru catalysts: catalytic effects on the n-butane/H2 test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adsorption of CO on hydrated 5 wt % Ru/Al 2 O 3 results in ν CO absorbance features at 2049, 1992, and 1924 cm -1 (Figure ). While the ν CO absorbance at 2049 cm -1 may be attributed to CO adsorption on the Al 2 O 3 support, this band is tentatively assigned as a Ru species since CO should preferentially adsorb to Ru rather than the support ,, and the 2049 cm -1 absorbance feature is much more intense on the reduced Ru/Al 2 O 3 than it was on Al 2 O 3 .
8 ATR-FTIR spectra of CO adsorption on 5 wt % Ru/Al 2 O 3 collected as a function of time.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adsorption of CO on hydrated 5 wt % Ru/Al 2 O 3 results in ν CO absorbance features at 2049, 1992, and 1924 cm -1 (Figure ). While the ν CO absorbance at 2049 cm -1 may be attributed to CO adsorption on the Al 2 O 3 support, this band is tentatively assigned as a Ru species since CO should preferentially adsorb to Ru rather than the support ,, and the 2049 cm -1 absorbance feature is much more intense on the reduced Ru/Al 2 O 3 than it was on Al 2 O 3 .
8 ATR-FTIR spectra of CO adsorption on 5 wt % Ru/Al 2 O 3 collected as a function of time.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There have been several models proposed to explain the appearance of three ν CO absorbance features when CO adsorbs on supported Ru catalysts . In all of these models, the ν CO absorbance feature at 2020−2040 cm -1 is attributed to a Ru x -CO species. ,, The ν CO absorbance features at 2140 and 2075 cm -1 have been assigned as the symmetric and asymmetric stretches of two CO molecules in gem-dicarbonyl, Ru I (CO) 2 , or as CO adsorption on low coordination edge and corner metal atoms with more than one adsorbed CO, and as the vibration of CO adsorbed on a surface oxide and on a Ru atom perturbed by a nearby O atom, respectively . Since the relative intensities of the ν CO absorbances at 2049, 1992, and 1924 cm -1 (Figures −10) depend upon the amount of coadsorbed water on the surface and the TPD curve is consistent with three CO bonding sites, these results indicate that there are three different adsorption sites on hydrated Ru/Al 2 O 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean particle size is subnanometric for Ru(Cl)/Al/M and 1.5 nm for Ru(acac)/Al/M. [44,45], which could explain the lower Ru o /Ru (total) ratios. However, the effect of electron-withdrawing species cannot be invoked to explain the lower Ru 0 /Ru (total) ratios of Ru(acac)/Al/M.…”
Section: Textural and Morphological Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawback of those metal nanoparticles is lack of stability, partly because of agglomerates formation of the metal nanoparticles capped with organic molecules during the photocatalytic H 2 production. Such an agglomeration problem of metal nanoparticles may be improved by the application of size-controlled nanoparticles to catalysts on a solid support, because controlled and precise growth of nanoparticles with the desired shape and size can be tuned by altering the morphology of the support as reported in the field of heterogeneous catalysis. However, there have been no systematic studies on the effects of supports on photocatalytic H 2 production with metal nanoparticles used as H 2 -evolution catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%