2020
DOI: 10.1248/cpb.c20-00551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Component Ratio on Analytical Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The template/monomer/crosslinker molar ratio is most frequently 1:4:20. This ratio is probable to provide optimum imprinting efficiency [66] and in the most cases the mentioned value of the molecular ratio is confirmed by the results of computer molecular modelling. The proportion of reagents is very important in non-covalent imprinting as it requires the presence of template-monomer complexes.…”
Section: The Greenness Assessment Of Mi-spe Technique For Pesticide Determinationsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The template/monomer/crosslinker molar ratio is most frequently 1:4:20. This ratio is probable to provide optimum imprinting efficiency [66] and in the most cases the mentioned value of the molecular ratio is confirmed by the results of computer molecular modelling. The proportion of reagents is very important in non-covalent imprinting as it requires the presence of template-monomer complexes.…”
Section: The Greenness Assessment Of Mi-spe Technique For Pesticide Determinationsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The following ratios were used for this synthesis: the template: monomer:crosslinker ratio for MIP1 and MIP3 was 1:6:20, while for MIP2 and MIP 4 it was 1:4:20. MIP1 and MIP3 used the ratio from the computational approach and Jobs results, while MIP 2 and MIP 4 used the ratio from the study of Pratama et al, 37 which demonstrated that the use of template-monomer (1:4) provides an excellent specific affinity and high recovery of template compound compared with NIP sorbents. The bulk method was used for the synthesis of MIPs and NIPs.…”
Section: Preparation Of the Mip And Nipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emphasis on monomer-template ratio here is a product of standard imprinting theory, in that affinity and selectivity are presumed to derive from the interaction of multiple polymer functionalities in the binding site [ 179 , 180 ]. Multiple studies suggest the optimal functional monomer-template ratio is 4:1 for most applications [ 164 , 179 , 181 ]. This does not include the crosslinker, which is often the major component of the polymer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%