2019
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1713496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the number of interference screws for the fixation of an intra-articular cranial cruciate ligament prosthesis in dogs: Biomechanical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its combined use with an interference screw fixation system was initially described as a surgical technique for synthetic cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction. Ex vivo biomechanical, pull-out and fatigue studies have reported very encouraging results regarding the strength of the implant itself, as well as the reliability of its interference screw fixation system ( Blanc et al ., 2019 ; Goin et al ., 2019 ). Tunnel drilling, the use of a cortical button and interference screw locking provide greater stability than implanted screws connected with suture or orthopedic wire ( Aron and Purinton, 1985 ; Diamond et al ., 1999 ; Harasen, 2000 ; Martin et al ., 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its combined use with an interference screw fixation system was initially described as a surgical technique for synthetic cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction. Ex vivo biomechanical, pull-out and fatigue studies have reported very encouraging results regarding the strength of the implant itself, as well as the reliability of its interference screw fixation system ( Blanc et al ., 2019 ; Goin et al ., 2019 ). Tunnel drilling, the use of a cortical button and interference screw locking provide greater stability than implanted screws connected with suture or orthopedic wire ( Aron and Purinton, 1985 ; Diamond et al ., 1999 ; Harasen, 2000 ; Martin et al ., 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1c and d ) (Novetech Surgery, Monaco) for excellent biocompatibility. Its design offers minimal invasiveness as well as strong and immediate fixation ( Blanc et al ., 2019 ; Goin et al ., 2019 ). Finally, the cortical button ( Fig.…”
Section: Case Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manufacturer reports a strong biomechanical resistance to traction strengths higher than the physiological CCL by more than 8,000 N ( Butler et al , 1983 ; Patterson et al , 1991 ). Based on state-of-the-art biomechanical tests carried out on this intra-articular reconstruction technique of the CCL, no implant rupture was reported in quasi-static pull-out tests ( Blanc et al , 2019 ) or in cyclic loading tests ( Goin et al , 2019 ), with a maximum resistance before implant slippage estimated at 690 ± 115 N. The synthetic ligament was sterilized with ethylene oxide and implanted with four titanium interference screws (diameter: 4.5 mm; length: 20 mm) provided by the same implant manufacturer ( Fig. 1c ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were thawed at room temperature for 24 hours. They were implanted with the UHMWPE synthetic implant according to the recommended “Out-In” surgical procedure, in which interference screws are implanted from the epiphyseal surface of the femur and the tibia toward the intra-articular space ( Blanc et al , 2019 ). Once the CCL was entirely resected, the implantation was performed on specific anatomical regions of the in vivo CCL insertion to ensure its physiological reconstruction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation