2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.06.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the pretreatment of Fe-silicalite on its activity in the ammoxidation of propane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very interesting is the comparison of mesoporous materials with microporous Fe-silicalite with concentration of iron 0.48 wt%. This material, as it has been shown previously, 19 showed quite interesting results in the direct ammoxidation of propane, good results were obtained over the sample which was activated in the diluted stream of propane and ammonia. As it is evident from the figure, at a similar conversion of propane, the calcined mesoporous material was more selective than the calcined Fe-silicalite.…”
Section: Catalysissupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Very interesting is the comparison of mesoporous materials with microporous Fe-silicalite with concentration of iron 0.48 wt%. This material, as it has been shown previously, 19 showed quite interesting results in the direct ammoxidation of propane, good results were obtained over the sample which was activated in the diluted stream of propane and ammonia. As it is evident from the figure, at a similar conversion of propane, the calcined mesoporous material was more selective than the calcined Fe-silicalite.…”
Section: Catalysissupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Our previous studies conducted on Fe-silicalites clearly showed that extraction of Fe species from the framework is essential for reaching high catalytic activity in propane ammoxidation. 18,19 Therefore, we deduced that framework Fe atoms cannot act as an active site. We are aware that framework of amorphous mesoporous silica is more flexible than the zeolitic structure which can change the properties of tetrahedral atoms in the framework.…”
Section: Catalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reactions catalyzed by these materials include (i) isomerization and oxidative dehydrogenation of alkanes, [1][2][3] (ii) selective oxidation of benzene to phenol using N 2 O as the oxidant, [4][5][6][7][8][9] (iii) reduction of NO x and N 2 O with hydrocarbons (HC-SCR) or ammonia (NH 3 -SCR), [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] direct N 2 O decomposition [19][20][21][22] and also (iv) direct ammoxidation of propane over differently activated Fe-silicalite in the presence of O 2 or O 2 /N 2 O as the oxidants. [23][24][25] For most of these reactions, the catalytic activity is thought to be related to extraframework iron species (iron oxides or oxohydroxide aggregates) formed by Fe extraction during the post-synthesis thermal treatments 1,2,7,8,[10][11][12]16,19,20,23 and acting either independently or in synergy with protonic RFe(OH)SiR (Brønsted acid) sites. 3,5,11,13,14,17,19,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] For most of these reactions, the catalytic activity is thought to be related to extraframework iron species (iron oxides or oxohydroxide aggregates) formed by Fe extraction during the post-synthesis thermal treatments 1,2,7,8,[10][11][12]16,19,20,23 and acting either independently or in synergy with protonic RFe(OH)SiR (Brønsted acid) sites. 3,5,11,13,14,17,19,24,25 Post-synthesis thermal treatments can be done either by calcination at high temperatures in air or by treatment in a flow of inert gas (or in a vacuum), but also in water vapor. 22 High temperature treatments of isomorphously substituted zeolites induce the removal of Fe 3+ from the framework to extraframework positions, with subsequent migration and grafting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%