2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the roughness produced by plasma nitrocarburizing on corrosion resistance of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[24] found that the Volta potential at valleys on the metal surface was more positive than that of peaks, indicating peaks were dissolved preferentially when corrosion occurred. Further, the potential difference (PD) of the adjacent valley and peak increases with the height difference, resulting in the enhancement of corrosion susceptibility of carbon steel, which coincided with previous studies [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…[24] found that the Volta potential at valleys on the metal surface was more positive than that of peaks, indicating peaks were dissolved preferentially when corrosion occurred. Further, the potential difference (PD) of the adjacent valley and peak increases with the height difference, resulting in the enhancement of corrosion susceptibility of carbon steel, which coincided with previous studies [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Superaustenitic steels produce values of resistance to pitting corrosion that clearly exceed those of commonly used austenitic steels, which are not stabilised by nitrogen [ 5 ]. Similar or even better corrosion resistance results can be obtained by the application of low-temperature nitriding (<450 °C) [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ], carburising (<500 °C) [ 13 , 14 , 15 ] or nitrocarburising (<450 °C) [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ] of austenitic steels that do not contain significant additions of nitrogen in their structure, such as, for example, AISI 304L, AISI 316L or AISI 321 steel. In these processes, the face centred cubic structure (fcc), which is present in the steel’s surface layer, shows a certain degree of deformability, which is dependent on the concentration of nitrogen and/or carbon [ 17 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The achieved E pit potential values are all the more surprising in view of the fact that the tests were conducted in a 0.5 M NaCl solution with a concentration of Cl − ions similar to that which is found in natural seawater. Cisquini et al [ 19 ] investigated the influence of the roughness induced by sputtering during plasma nitrocarburising and of process temperature on the corrosion resistance of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel in a 3.5% aqueous solution of sodium chloride. For example, a specimen nitrocarburised at 430 °C with a layer thickness of 12.9 µm and surface roughness of 0.71 µm showed a pitting potential of approx.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical-heat treatment of cutting tools includes the diffusion saturation technology applied to the surface layer for elements C, N, B. In this case, cementation, nitriding [18], nitrocarburizing [19], and boriding [20] were used. Notably, the choice of a proper chemical-thermal treatment method depends on the tool surface layer requirements and heat resistance of the tool's material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%