2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the soil cover depth on the seismic response in a large-span thin-walled corrugated steel plate bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the aim of the study is to determine the effect of seismic excitation on a CSP bridge with span exceeding 17 m and a variable depth of the soil cover above the steel shell (from 1.0 to 5.0 m). The obtained results demonstrate that the depth of the soil cover has a significant impact on the response of the bridge [10].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Therefore, the aim of the study is to determine the effect of seismic excitation on a CSP bridge with span exceeding 17 m and a variable depth of the soil cover above the steel shell (from 1.0 to 5.0 m). The obtained results demonstrate that the depth of the soil cover has a significant impact on the response of the bridge [10].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, the area of sustainability is very broad, which is confirmed by numerous studies on this subject. In papers [3,4], the authors contributed to the aspect of sustainable development by using a construction material in the form of a natural aggregate (backfilled sand). Thanks to this, a large span of the structure was obtained with a relatively low consumption of structural steel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are structures erected in accordance with the principles of sustainable development, which allow you to make savings. Approaches to sustainable development are presented in many papers; for example, by Ma et al [1], Kisku et al [2], and Embaby et al [3], as well as Maleska and Beben [4]. In the case of geodesic domes, the cost-effectiveness results from the possibility of approximating the initial face of the polyhedron to smaller ones and, consequently, obtaining straight struts with a slight variation in their length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different to HRM, VRM is challenging and risky because the force of the rotating system varies due to the position change of superstructure. Finite element method (FEM) is a useful tool to simulate stress and deformation during construction process and analyze the strength and stability of various bridge components [8][9][10][11][12]. Ma et al [13] simulated the rotating structure in three dimensions of a concrete-filled steel tube concrete basket arch bridge, and the most unfavorable stress conditions were determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%