2018
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.isijint-2017-578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the Surface Layer Strained by Mechanical Grinding on X-ray Diffraction Analysis

Abstract: X-ray diffraction is a powerful tool for characterizing the microstructure of steels. However, the strained surface by mechanical grinding could cause some errors in X-ray diffraction analysis. In this work, the strained layer was found to affect peak intensity, peak positions and enlarge the full width at half maximum. A quantitative relation between the depth of damaged layer and particle size of sander papers was established.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The XRD analysis was carried out on the polished specimens [ 31 ] of the monolithic magnesium alloy AZ91 and its composites using MiniFlex 300/600 Regaku tabletop XRD diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan) to determine the possible phases available. The samples were exposed to Cu K-α radiation ( λ = 1.5406 Å) at a scanning speed of 10°/min and step width of 0.020 deg.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The XRD analysis was carried out on the polished specimens [ 31 ] of the monolithic magnesium alloy AZ91 and its composites using MiniFlex 300/600 Regaku tabletop XRD diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan) to determine the possible phases available. The samples were exposed to Cu K-α radiation ( λ = 1.5406 Å) at a scanning speed of 10°/min and step width of 0.020 deg.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tensile-tested specimens with different strain were polished with sand paper and then electropolished in an acid mixture (H 3 PO 4 :CrO 3 = 2:1) by more than 50 µm, in order to eliminate the effect of strained layers by grinding. 24) The X-ray diffraction measurements, with a Cu-K¡ 1 radiation source (wavelength: 0.15418 nm), were carried out at 40 kV and 40 mA. The rotation speed of the detector was 0.8°/min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the surface of specimens was removed by 50 μm by electrolytic polishing to remove the surface layer affected by the sand paper grinding. 12) The rotation speed of detector was 0.003 deg/s. The instrumental function was corrected based on Voigt profiles analysis 13) using the standard material: LaB 6 , (No.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%