2015
DOI: 10.5194/aab-58-193-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the temperament of dairy cows on lifetime production efficiency

Abstract: Abstract. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of the temperament of cows on their lifetime production efficiency. Data on milk performance, longevity and culling reasons of 11 629 Polish Holstein-Friesian cows were extracted from the SYMLEK database. Using the methodology of the Polish Federation of Cattle Breeders and Dairy Farmers, cow temperament was assessed as follows: 1 – calm; 2 – normal; and 3 – excitable or aggressive. Most cows showed a normal temperament (89.52 %). Over successive years … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, excitable beef cattle (measured as reactivity to confinement in a chute and flight speed following release from the chute) have lower growth rates (Müller and von Keyserlingk, 2006;Cafe et al, 2011;Bruno et al, 2016), lower BW (Cziszter et al, 2016), and poor carcass quality such as yield and quality grade, back fat, and marbling score (Nkrumah et al, 2007;Reinhardt et al, 2009) compared with calm cattle. Dairy cattle scored as more reactive in the milking parlor produce less milk (Sutherland and Dowling, 2014;Hedlund and Løvlie, 2015), milk out slower (Sewalem et al, 2011), and have reduced lifetime production efficiency (Neja et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, excitable beef cattle (measured as reactivity to confinement in a chute and flight speed following release from the chute) have lower growth rates (Müller and von Keyserlingk, 2006;Cafe et al, 2011;Bruno et al, 2016), lower BW (Cziszter et al, 2016), and poor carcass quality such as yield and quality grade, back fat, and marbling score (Nkrumah et al, 2007;Reinhardt et al, 2009) compared with calm cattle. Dairy cattle scored as more reactive in the milking parlor produce less milk (Sutherland and Dowling, 2014;Hedlund and Løvlie, 2015), milk out slower (Sewalem et al, 2011), and have reduced lifetime production efficiency (Neja et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been a growth in interest in the connections between personality, health, welfare, and productivity in farm animals [ 1 , 2 ]. It has been suggested that different personalities may vary in terms of their disease susceptibility [ 3 ], physiological response to stress [ 4 , 5 ] and production traits [ 6 11 ]. Furthermore, considering personality in the context of animal breeding seems to be a promising approach for improving the robustness and welfare of farm animals [ 1 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cows with a calm temperament, milk yield in the first lactation was 621 kg higher than in cows with a "normal" temperament and 329 kg higher than in cows with a nervous (aggressive) temperament. Neja et al (2015) and Bharadawaj et al (2007) found that milk yield of Murrah buffalo was higher in calm (2,120 ± 27 kg) than in nervous cows (1,829 ± 49 kg) and lowest in aggressive animals (1,743 ± 147 kg). Kalińska and Slósarz (2016) studied the influence of cow temperament and milking speed, their lifelong milk production, and the causes of cow culling.…”
Section: Influence Of Temperament On Production and Reproduction Traitsmentioning
confidence: 96%