Effect of the Temporal Window of Integration of Speech Sound on Mismatch Negativity

Abstract

Speech-sound stimuli have a complex structure, and it is unclear how the brain processes them. An event-related potential (ERP), known as mismatch negativity (MMN), is elicited when an individual's brain detects a rare sound. In this study, MMNs were measured in response to an omitted segment of a complex sound consisting of a Japanese vowel. The results indicated that the latency from onset in the right hemisphere was significantly shorter than that in the frontal midline and left hemispheres during left ear stimulation. Additionally, the results of latency from omission showed that the latency of stimuli omitted in the latter part of the temporal window of integration (TWI) was longer than that of stimuli omitted in the first part of the TWI. The mean peak amplitude was found to be higher in the right hemisphere than in the frontal midline and left hemispheres in response to left ear stimulation. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that would be incorrect to believe that the stimuli have strictly the characteristics of speech-sound. However. the results of the interaction effect in the latencies from omission were insignificant. These results suggest that the detection time for deviance may not be related to the stimulus ear. However, the type of deviant stimuli on latencies was found to be significant. This is because the detection of the deviants was delayed when a deviation occurred in the latter part of the TWI, regardless of the stimulation of the ear.

Introduction of the Special Issue on “Neurophysiology/Neuroimaging Study in Japan”

“…By analyzing the normalized power variance of electroencephalography (EEG), Aoki et al 7 demonstrated that EEG has another dimension, which contains much clinically useful information about cortical electrical activity. Hoshino et al 8 measured the mismatch negativity to an omitted segment of a complex sound consisting of a Japanese vowel in male healthy subjects. Their results suggest that the detection time for deviance may not be related to the stimulus ear.…”