2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of thermal modification on the properties of narrow-leaved ash and chestnut

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At its end of life cycle, heat-treated wood can be recycled without detrimental impact to the environment to the contrary of chemically treated wood impregnated with biocidal active ingredients (CRIQ 2003). This environmental acceptable treatment improves wood decay resistance (Tjeerdsma et al 2000) and dimensional stability (Korkut et al 2012), decreases wood Equilibrium Moisture Content (EMC) (Hill 2006) and induces a darker coloration of wood (Chen et al 2012), without additional chemical products. Therefore, heat treatment allows to use low durability local timber whose natural durability is low by making them resistant towards decay for a end-use in use class 2 and 3 (use class 4 being excluded due to the occurrence of soft rots) (EN 335 2013) and with high economic value (Allegretti et al 2012 ;Kamdem et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At its end of life cycle, heat-treated wood can be recycled without detrimental impact to the environment to the contrary of chemically treated wood impregnated with biocidal active ingredients (CRIQ 2003). This environmental acceptable treatment improves wood decay resistance (Tjeerdsma et al 2000) and dimensional stability (Korkut et al 2012), decreases wood Equilibrium Moisture Content (EMC) (Hill 2006) and induces a darker coloration of wood (Chen et al 2012), without additional chemical products. Therefore, heat treatment allows to use low durability local timber whose natural durability is low by making them resistant towards decay for a end-use in use class 2 and 3 (use class 4 being excluded due to the occurrence of soft rots) (EN 335 2013) and with high economic value (Allegretti et al 2012 ;Kamdem et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies conducted on various wood species have not confirmed any significant effect of thermal processing on surface roughness (Budakçı et al 2013;Kvietková et al 2015a, b). Generally, reduced roughness is associated with increasing modification temperature and time (Gündüz et al 2008;Korkut and Guller 2008;Korkut et al 2012;Priadi and Hiziroglu 2013;Kesik et al 2014;Salca and Hiziroglu 2014;Tasdemir and Hiziroglu 2014;Tomak et al 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yildiz [26] conducted research on heat-treated spruce (Picea orientalis) and beech (Fagus orientalis) woods, mentioned that heat-treated samples at 200 °C for 10 h. density decreased 10.53% and 18.37%, respectively. Thermal degradation of wood material depends on wood species and process conditions such as treatment stage, treatment temperature and duration [27,28]. The results of the analysis of variance of the impregnation and heat treatment effects on temperature and light density of flame source combustion and without flame source combustion stages presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%