2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.117201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of time delay on the impedance control of a pressure-based, current-driven Electroacoustic Absorber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, these results show the interest of coupling the programmable EL to the tube, which can act as a nonlinear resonator and have interesting applications, such as nonlinear semi-passive control (acoustically passive but electrically active because of the loudspeaker). 29,30 However, it can be seen from Figure 6 that there are some zone, that is, between 710 and 800 Hz, where the response of the system with coupled EL presents higher amplitudes than the one of the tube without EL. In this study, we did not perform optimization of parameters for optimal attenuation of sound via EL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, these results show the interest of coupling the programmable EL to the tube, which can act as a nonlinear resonator and have interesting applications, such as nonlinear semi-passive control (acoustically passive but electrically active because of the loudspeaker). 29,30 However, it can be seen from Figure 6 that there are some zone, that is, between 710 and 800 Hz, where the response of the system with coupled EL presents higher amplitudes than the one of the tube without EL. In this study, we did not perform optimization of parameters for optimal attenuation of sound via EL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Its impedance can be controlled by a pressure-based current-driven architecture. 2 Despite the physiological time delay of the digital control, which can affect the passivity margins at high frequencies, 3 such ER strategy has demonstrated its efficiency for both room-modal equalization 4 and sound transmission mitigation in waveguides. [5][6][7][8][9] The model-inversion algorithm has also been extended to contemplate nonlinear target dynamics at low excitation levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9] The model-inversion algorithm has also been extended to contemplate nonlinear target dynamics at low excitation levels. [10][11][12][13] In, 14 for the first time, a programmable liner involving the spatial derivative was realised by distributed electroacoustic devices. It was the first form of the Advection Boundary Law (ABL), then implemented on ER arrays lining an acoustic waveguide in, [15][16][17] where it demonstrated non-reciprocal sound propagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such behaviour is unwelcome, even if it occurs outside of the frequency band of interest, because it can result in an unstable positive acoustic feedback. In other words, if at a given frequency, the absorber injects more energy than the acoustic environment dissipates, energy will build-up, leading to an instability [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%