1994
DOI: 10.3109/01050399409047484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Time-Scale Modification of Speech on the Speech Recognition Threshold in Noise for Hearing-Impaired and Language-Impaired Children

Abstract: In this study, the effect of time-compression and expansion of speech on speech perception in noise was measured for a group of hearing-impaired and a group of language-impaired children relative to control groups of normal children and normal adults. The children's ages ranged from 9 to 12 years. For all time-scale modified conditions, both hearing-impaired and language-impaired children had significantly higher speech recognition thresholds in noise (SRTN) than their normal peers, who performed almost equall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is largely consistent with the literature investigating sentence perception in normal and reading-impaired subjects (cf. (Stollman et al, 1994). In one study, poor-reading children were impaired at discriminating phoneme contrasts embedded in sentences compressed at 50% (Watson et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is largely consistent with the literature investigating sentence perception in normal and reading-impaired subjects (cf. (Stollman et al, 1994). In one study, poor-reading children were impaired at discriminating phoneme contrasts embedded in sentences compressed at 50% (Watson et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to QS, NAS was characterized by slower speech rates, higher pitch, and more energy in the 1-3 kHz range. It is important to note that, despite the wealth of production and perception studies in clear speech and NAS research, a direct relationship between some of the acoustic-phonetic features examined and intelligibility is still rather tenuous (Ferguson, 2004;Picheny et al 1989;Stollman et al 1994;Uchanski et al 1996). Furthermore, it remains to be seen whether these are the same features that contribute to the observed improvements in recognition memory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, to varying presentation conditions, a few studies used speech cue enhancement manipulations in order to investigate possible connections between specific acoustic cues and intelligibility (Picheny et al. 1989; Stollman et al. 1994; Hazan and Simpson 1998, 2000; Liu and Zeng 2006).…”
Section: Talker‐ Listener‐ and Signal‐dependent Effects In Clear Speechmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative to looking at naturally produced clear speech, which involves modifications along various articulatory/acoustic dimensions, all of which can affect intelligibility, several studies used signal‐processing to assess the role of individual acoustic cues on intelligibility (Picheny et al. 1989; Stollman et al. 1994; Uchanski et al.…”
Section: Talker‐ Listener‐ and Signal‐dependent Effects In Clear Speechmentioning
confidence: 99%