1998
DOI: 10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.84.7_510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of TiN Size on Ferrite Nucleation on TiN in Low-C Steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] Even though the heavy deformation of super-cooled austenite followed by accelerated cooling has been generally accepted as an effective way of producing ultrafine grained steels, other approaches that exploit the fine precipitates dispersed at both the grain boundaries and in the matrix as ferrite nucleation sites have also been attempted. [4][5][6] Ishikawa et al 7) showed that vanadium nitride (VN) particles, which precipitated at the austenite grain boundaries, enhance ferrite nucleation and induce a random distribution of the ferrite orientation. Furuhara et al 8) also showed that the orientation of the intragranular ferrites, which nucleated at the compound precipitates composed of manganese sulfide and vanadium nitride, deviates from the KurdjumovSachs (K-S) orientation relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Even though the heavy deformation of super-cooled austenite followed by accelerated cooling has been generally accepted as an effective way of producing ultrafine grained steels, other approaches that exploit the fine precipitates dispersed at both the grain boundaries and in the matrix as ferrite nucleation sites have also been attempted. [4][5][6] Ishikawa et al 7) showed that vanadium nitride (VN) particles, which precipitated at the austenite grain boundaries, enhance ferrite nucleation and induce a random distribution of the ferrite orientation. Furuhara et al 8) also showed that the orientation of the intragranular ferrites, which nucleated at the compound precipitates composed of manganese sulfide and vanadium nitride, deviates from the KurdjumovSachs (K-S) orientation relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-17 J Both ΔG*3 and ΔG*4 values are smaller than Morikage's calculation for AF nucleation on TiN. 37) In particular, the observation that ΔG*4 is the lowest value for the assumed potential nucleation events indicates that formation of the MTO-A, B-N, and K-S orientation relationships are effective for the AF nucleation. Thus, it is considered that the formation of the MTO-A orientation relationship would permit both the B-N and K-S orientation relationships and result in enhancement of AF nucleation, though the formation of the MTO-A orientation relationship itself has a negative effect on AF nucleation.…”
Section: Formation Mechanism Of Afmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Early reports 20) showed that the minimum diameter of TiN particles needed to nucleate intragranular ferrite in low carbon steels was approximately 200 nm and the increase in the number of inclusions promotes the formation of intragranu- lar ferrite due to increasing intragranular inclusion surface area. Also, Oh et al 21) reported that the critical prior austenite grain size for stable formation of intragranular ferrite should be larger than 100 µm and the fraction of intragranular ferrite increased with increasing prior austenite grain size up to 350 µm.…”
Section: Effects Of Titanium and Oxygen Content On Microstructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%