2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of tool rotating rate on foaming properties of porous aluminum fabricated by using friction stir processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
59
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study, we confirmed that there was , in the case of A1050 porous aluminum. 13) According to this result, a larger precursor can be made with a similar FSP time to that required for a smaller precursor by increasing the tool rotating rate. Precursors of FSP-L porous aluminum of 10.5 mm thickness, 25 mm width and 25 mm length were machined from the region stirred by FSP.…”
Section: Fsp Procedures Of Fsp-l Porous Aluminummentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a previous study, we confirmed that there was , in the case of A1050 porous aluminum. 13) According to this result, a larger precursor can be made with a similar FSP time to that required for a smaller precursor by increasing the tool rotating rate. Precursors of FSP-L porous aluminum of 10.5 mm thickness, 25 mm width and 25 mm length were machined from the region stirred by FSP.…”
Section: Fsp Procedures Of Fsp-l Porous Aluminummentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The holding temperature (equal to the preheated temperature) was determined by reference to our previous study 13) and was fixed at 1003 K during the heating process. The holding time for FSP-S porous aluminum was fixed at 10 min, also in accordance with our previous study, 13) whereas that for FSP-L porous aluminum was varied from 14 to 15 min. The sample was then cooled to room temperature under ambient conditions.…”
Section: Foaming Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1(c) and 1(d), was applied to obtain a larger precursor and to mix the powders thoroughly. 13) As shown in Fig. 1(d), precursor samples of 35 mm © 35 mm © 4.5 mm aluminum bonded with 80 mm © 35 mm © 2 mm steel sheets were cut from the region subjected to FSP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%