1993
DOI: 10.1117/12.140622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of topography on SAR calibration

Abstract: During normal SAR processing, a flat earth is assumed when performing radiometric corrections such as antenna pattern and scattering element size removal. Here we examine the effects of topographic variations on these corrections. Local slopes will cause the actual scattering element size to be different from that calculated using the flat earth assumption. It is shown that this effect, which is present for both airborne and spaceborne SAR data, may easily cause calibration errors on the order of a dB. In the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, 30 m resolution DEM data were used to correct terrain-induced distortions in the Radarsat-2 data. Based on the method introduced by van Zyl [31], the backscattering coefficient of the SAR image was corrected to a reference surface:…”
Section: Radarsat-2 Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, 30 m resolution DEM data were used to correct terrain-induced distortions in the Radarsat-2 data. Based on the method introduced by van Zyl [31], the backscattering coefficient of the SAR image was corrected to a reference surface:…”
Section: Radarsat-2 Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The look-angle of JERS varies by a few degrees across its swath and the effect on scattering processes, particularly in forested areas, is to make a brighter signal return in the near-range than in the far-range, even after appropriate scattering-area calibration (Van Zyl, 1993;Van Zyl, Chapman, Dubois, & Shi, 1993). Thus, although crosscorrelation between JERS and ERS data was very successful in geometrically matching the scenes, where the far-range of one track was united to the near-range of another track within one ERS reference frame, the difference in image brightness along the image edges became very apparent.…”
Section: Jers Radiometric Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, when images, acquired by the same sensor at different incidence angles, are fused, since the received backscattered radiation is strongly depending on the angle and, thus, on the topography, it is necessary to apply radiometric corrections. This can be done by using a digital elevation model (DEM); a correction of the considered images can be exploited to obtain a real view of the observed scene [9,32,33].…”
Section: Fusion Of Multipolarization-multifrequency-multiresolution Smentioning
confidence: 99%