2015 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2015.0272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of transducer port cavities in invasive ultrasonic transit-time gas flowmeters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using beam forming, a two-dimensional arrangement of microphones is sufficient for a three-dimensional reconstruction [25]. However, measurements with microphones are invasive and distort the sound pressure field [26]. Furthermore, microphones typically feature diameters of several millimeters and have a direction characteristic, limiting the spatial resolution to several millimeters and distorting measurements based on relative sound source position [27].…”
Section: State-of-the-art 21 Sound Pressure Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using beam forming, a two-dimensional arrangement of microphones is sufficient for a three-dimensional reconstruction [25]. However, measurements with microphones are invasive and distort the sound pressure field [26]. Furthermore, microphones typically feature diameters of several millimeters and have a direction characteristic, limiting the spatial resolution to several millimeters and distorting measurements based on relative sound source position [27].…”
Section: State-of-the-art 21 Sound Pressure Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dispersion curves are used to show the frequency dependence of the velocities (Draudviliene et al, 2018;Hora and Cerven a, 2012). Considering ultrasonic flow measurement, experimental and simulation-based studies include the following categories: investigating the effects of pipe configurations on ultrasonic flowmeters (Holm et al, 1995;Hilgenstock and Ernst, 1996;Pamela et al, 2000;Zhao et al, 2015), studying flow profile correction factor (Zhao et al, 2015;O'Sullivan and Wright, 2002;Cheon and Poong Hyun, 2005;Weissenbrunner et al, 2016), exploring transducer protrusion and recess effects on ultrasonic flowmeters (Raišutis, 2006;Zheng et al, 2011;Hoffmann et al, 2015) and considering acoustics effects in ultrasonic flowmeters (Bezdek et al, 2007;Tezuka et al, 2008;Zheng et al, 2016;Sun et al, 2018b). Lamb wave propagation in pipe walls was studied by many authors (Park et al, 2009;Yashiro et al, 2007;Hern andez et al, 2018;Faisal Haider et al, 2017;Luyao et al, 2014;Lu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ruppel and Peters (2004) explored the UFM sensitivity of transducer installation angles for UFMs, and error shift in UFMs was used as the indicator. Dandan et al (2011) and Hoffmann et al (2015) identified a systematic error related to protrusion and recess effects of an acoustic transducer employing a numerical simulation and experiment, and the diffused averaged flow profile was studied under different Re numbers. Weissenbrunner et al (2016) proposed placing a flowmeter in a Venturi constriction to decrease the measurement uncertainty stemming from the uncertain upstream condition, and the error of measured flow rate was a major parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%