2020
DOI: 10.1002/jum.15363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Treatment Sequencing on the Tumor Response to Combined Treatment With Ultrasound‐Stimulated Microbubbles and Radiotherapy

Abstract: Objectives-To investigate whether timing and sequencing of ultrasoundstimulated microbubbles (USMBs) and external beam radiotherapy (XRT) affect the treatment response in a preclinical prostate cancer model. Methods-Prostate cancer xenografts were treated with ultrasound-stimulated lipid microspheres before and after 8-Gy XRT. Treatments were separated by 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours, with 5 tumors per group. Tumor effects were evaluated by microvessel density (measured by CD31 staining), cell death (terminal deo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maximum reduction in microvessel density was observed at 6 h, which coincident with the highest cell death observed at the same time point (6 h). Similarly, the hypoxia level was found to be maximum for USMB-XRT and XRT-USMB at 6 h compared to USMB-XRT and XRT-USMB, respectively, at 0 h [ 97 ]. This study looked at the effect of reversing the sequence for USMB and XRT; however, the parameters for each treatment condition were kept constant.…”
Section: Effects Of Sequencing and Treatment Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum reduction in microvessel density was observed at 6 h, which coincident with the highest cell death observed at the same time point (6 h). Similarly, the hypoxia level was found to be maximum for USMB-XRT and XRT-USMB at 6 h compared to USMB-XRT and XRT-USMB, respectively, at 0 h [ 97 ]. This study looked at the effect of reversing the sequence for USMB and XRT; however, the parameters for each treatment condition were kept constant.…”
Section: Effects Of Sequencing and Treatment Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The duration between USMB and XRT was separated by 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Maximum tumor response (confirmed using power Doppler imaging and immunohistochemistry) was observed when USMB and XRT were administered 6 hours apart [ 39 ]. Their data are partially in alignment with our results that confirmed 6-hour delay between USMB and XRT caused highest cell death and decreased vascular index however, in our study, a 6-hour delay didn’t improve the treatment outcome as compared to 0 hour except for 570 kPa, 0.01% (v/v) MB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. found no difference between USMB-XRT and XRT-USMB treatment sequences while determining a 6-h treatment separation between XRT and USMB to produce the greatest treatment effects in a PC-3 prostate-carcinoma mouse model [ 69 ]. The exploration of the therapeutic benefits of a multi-USMB treatment sequence also warrants further investigation [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%