2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of tungsten-resistant bacteria on uptake of tungsten by lettuce and tungsten speciation in plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). The data obtained by us are consistent with earlier studies [28,29], according to which molybdenum is vital for the normal growth and development of plants.…”
Section: Determination Of Aldehyde Oxidase Activity In Native Gel Aft...supporting
confidence: 92%
“…2). The data obtained by us are consistent with earlier studies [28,29], according to which molybdenum is vital for the normal growth and development of plants.…”
Section: Determination Of Aldehyde Oxidase Activity In Native Gel Aft...supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The speciation of tungsten in lettuce plants shows the presence of both the monomeric form and the poly-tungstates. X-ray absorption spectra (XAS) and X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) showed that tungsten was present in lettuce as poly-tungstate in the root portion, while in the shoots it was mainly present as a monomer [95].…”
Section: Plant Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were found in other studies, which also indicated that companion planting increased the microbial diversity of pepper continuous cropping soil and changed the soil microbial community structures. Companion planting systems play an important roles in the soil microbial diversity and community composition [ 53 ], and the reason may be due to the microbial interactions. In addition, the beta diversity showed that there were significant differences in microbial structures and compositions among different companion planting treatments ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%