2011
DOI: 10.4103/0974-6781.91284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of two different abutment types on stress distribution in the bone around an implant under two loading conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Load transfer at the bone-implant interface depends on: (1) The implant geometry and the design of implant abutment connection; (2) the loading protocol and the type of occlusion; (3) the number of implants and position; (4) the quality and quantity of the surrounding bone. [ 2 3 4 5 6 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Load transfer at the bone-implant interface depends on: (1) The implant geometry and the design of implant abutment connection; (2) the loading protocol and the type of occlusion; (3) the number of implants and position; (4) the quality and quantity of the surrounding bone. [ 2 3 4 5 6 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Von Mises stresses from occlusal loading are initially transferred from the implant to the cervical (crestal) bone, as a compact bone has a higher modulus of elasticity compared to spongious bone. 25,26 In the presented analysis spongious bone maximum stress was only 65.69 MPa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Bone quality like spongy bone define more stress. [4] Micro gap between abutment and implant can leads to problems such as peri-implantitis and fatigue failures. This study consist the value of microgap of external and internal connections.…”
Section: Optimization Processmentioning
confidence: 99%