2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of two-step adhesive systems on inhibition of secondary caries around fluoride-releasing resin composite restorations in root dentine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the methodology to create a cavity after caries development and its removal, described in the present study, is closer to the clinical operative procedure than the cavity preparation made in sound dentin, as reported in several studies. 3,10,21,22 The area (10,000 mm 2 ) to evaluate the mineral distribution along the interface by m-EDX analysis was selected because the fluoride ions released from adhesive systems can diffuse into dentin up to 30 mm from the interface, 4 the IZ thickness created by fluoride adhesive systems ranges from 1 to 17 mm thickness 2,5,6 and the monomer MDPB does not leach out from the material, 13 thus its antibacterial effect can be restricted to the interface. The results of the present study showed that the IZ formation and its mineral distribution were influenced by artificial caries methods and adhesive systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the methodology to create a cavity after caries development and its removal, described in the present study, is closer to the clinical operative procedure than the cavity preparation made in sound dentin, as reported in several studies. 3,10,21,22 The area (10,000 mm 2 ) to evaluate the mineral distribution along the interface by m-EDX analysis was selected because the fluoride ions released from adhesive systems can diffuse into dentin up to 30 mm from the interface, 4 the IZ thickness created by fluoride adhesive systems ranges from 1 to 17 mm thickness 2,5,6 and the monomer MDPB does not leach out from the material, 13 thus its antibacterial effect can be restricted to the interface. The results of the present study showed that the IZ formation and its mineral distribution were influenced by artificial caries methods and adhesive systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in vitro secondary caries tests and evaluation methods have been developed that assess demineralized lesions and inhibition zones of dentin due to acid challenge. These methods include polarized light microscopy 7,8,9) , a microhardness test 8,10,11) , microradiography 5,12) , confocal laser-scanning microscopy and the x-ray analytical microscope 13,14) . However, the magnification of such methods is limited if more detailed information at the interface between the cavity and restoration is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For in vitro assessment of caries inhibition around restorative materials, methods such as polarized light microscopy 4) , microradiography 5) , and confocal laser scanning microscopy 6,7) have been used. However, the extent of magnification to which these methods permit is limited if more detailed information at the restoration-cavity interface is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%