Objective: Wilms tumor (WT) is a common malignant solid tumor in children. Many tumor biomarkers have been reported; however, there are poorly targetable molecular mechanisms which have been defined in WT. This study aimed to identify the oncogene in WT and explore the potential mechanisms.Methods: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in three independent RNA-seq datasets were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas data portal and the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GSE66405 and GSE73209). The common DEGs were then subjected to Gene Ontology enrichment analysis, protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analysis, and gene set enrichment analysis. The protein expression levels of the hub gene were analyzed by immunohistochemical analysis and Western blotting in a 60 WT sample. The univariate Kaplan–Meier analysis for overall survival was performed, and the log-rank test was utilized. A small interfering RNA targeting cell division cycle 20 (CDC20) was transfected into G401 and SK-NEP-1 cell lines. The Cell Counting Kit-8 assay and wound healing assay were used to observe the changes in cell proliferation and migration after transfection. Flow cytometry was used to detect the effect on the cell cycle. Western blot was conducted to study the changes of related functional proteins.Results: We commonly identified 44 upregulation and 272 downregulation differentially expressed genes in three independent RNA-seq datasets. Gene and pathway enrichment analyses of the regulatory networks involving hub genes suggested that cell cycle changes are crucial in WT. The top 15 highly connected genes were found by PPI network analysis. Furthermore, we demonstrated that one candidate biomarker, CDC20, for the diagnosis of WT was detected, and its high expression predicted poor prognosis of WT patients. Moreover, the area under the curve value obtained by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis from paired WT samples was 0.9181. Finally, we found that the suppression of CDC20 inhibited proliferation and migration and resulted in G2/M phase arrest in WT cells. The mechanism may be involved in increasing the protein level of securin, cyclin B1, and cyclin AConclusion: Our results suggest that CDC20 could serve as a candidate diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for WT, and suppression of CDC20 may be a potential approach for the prevention and treatment of WT.