2018
DOI: 10.17135/jdhs.2018.18.3.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Ultra-Soft and Soft Toothbrushes on the Removal of Plaque and Tooth Abrasion

Abstract: To improve the oral health status of Korean people, it is necessary to encourage proper oral hygiene management habits, such as toothbrushing, through appropriate health promotion techniques. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the removal of plaque and tooth abrasion using ultra-soft (filament 0.11∼0.12 mm) and soft toothbrushes for toothbrushing. The plaque removal was performed using a dentiform and Arti-spray, and the Patient Hygiene Performance (PHP) index was calculated as the sum total … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 This study discovered that the roughness value of soft-filament toothbrushes was lower than that of medium-filament toothbrushes, and the group brushed with lowabrasive toothpaste had a lower surface roughness value compared to that with high abrasive toothpaste. These are in accordance with the research of Jeong et al 16 , which stated that brushing with a soft-filament toothbrush produced a lower surface roughness value than brushing with a medium-filament toothbrush. This result might occur because soft-filament toothbrushes have the capability to spread small amounts 0,41 ± 0,18 0,36 ± 0,13 0,4 ± 0,15 0,25 ± 0,09 of toothpaste.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…8 This study discovered that the roughness value of soft-filament toothbrushes was lower than that of medium-filament toothbrushes, and the group brushed with lowabrasive toothpaste had a lower surface roughness value compared to that with high abrasive toothpaste. These are in accordance with the research of Jeong et al 16 , which stated that brushing with a soft-filament toothbrush produced a lower surface roughness value than brushing with a medium-filament toothbrush. This result might occur because soft-filament toothbrushes have the capability to spread small amounts 0,41 ± 0,18 0,36 ± 0,13 0,4 ± 0,15 0,25 ± 0,09 of toothpaste.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, after using the ultra-soft single-headed toothbrush, most of the present study participants considered that the degree of perceived cleanliness obtained was similar to that achieved with the other toothbrushes, whereas in fact the observed plaque score reduction from the baseline was approximately 36%, being lower than the reduction achieved with the other brushes. The diameter of bristles commonly used in toothbrushes has been reported to range from 0.12 mm (ultra-soft ) to 0.15 mm (extra-soft ), 0.18 mm (soft), 0.2 mm (medium), and 0.23 mm (hard) [8,10,27,28]. In this study, T-shaped and triple-headed toothbrushes with soft bristles measuring 0.163-0.165 mm in diameter were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, given that toothbrush selection followed the preference and recommendations of the patients, the diameter of the bristles was not uniform. Fourth, the use of only plaque control records to determine plaque-removal efficacy was insufficient, and the use of other measurements, such as the Turesky Plaque Index and Bleeding Index are recommended for future studies [8,10]. Finally, due to the single-test study design, the possible occurrence of gingival abrasion after the long-term use of toothbrushes [39] was not evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation