Effect of Ultrasonic Activation of Endodontic Sealers on Intratubular Penetration and Bond Strength to Root Dentin

de, Igor Abreu; Oliveira, Renata Aqel de; Weissheimer, Theodoro; Bier, Carlos Alexandre Souza; Só, Marcus Vinícius Reis; Rosa, Ricardo Abreu da

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.014

Cited by 27 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Considering that in the present investigation, all evaluated sealers had calcium in their composition, and hence the Fluo-3 dye was used. Despite being a consolidated marker, previous studies that used Rhodamine B together with materials containing calcium may have overestimated the sealer intratubular penetration (El-Hachem et al, 2019;De-Bem et al, 2020;Eid et al, 2021). This was confirmed by Furtado et al (2021) and supported by the current study, which showed that the values of sealer penetration were lower than those found in studies that used Rhodamine B (Piai et al, 2018;El-Hachem et al, 2019;Eid et al, 2021).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

“…This lab study of quantitative nature investigated the dentinal tubule penetration of Bio-C Sealer in comparison with AH Plus, Sealer Plus BC, and EndoSequence BC Sealer, using CLSM (Ordinola-Zapata et al, 2009;Jardine et al, 2016;Piai et al, 2018;El-Hachem et al, 2019;De-Bem et al, 2020;Eid et al, 2021).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The sealer penetration and the adhesive interface established between the filling material and dentin can be assessed by different methodologies, with confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) being the most accepted (Tedesco et al, 2014;Jardine et al, 2016;Jeong et al, 2017;Piai et al, 2018;El-Hachem et al, 2019;Coronas et al, 2020;De-Bem et al, 2020;Eid et al, 2021;Furtado et al, 2021). Fluo-3 is a fluorescent indicator that traces calcium ions, and it can be used to trace the penetration of calcium silicate-based sealers in the dentinal tubules (Jeong et al, 2017;Coronas et al, 2020;Furtado et al, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Avaliação da penetração intratubular do Bio-C Sealer: um cimento à base de silicato de cálcio

Pelisser¹,

Matoso²,

Kirchhoff³

et al. 2022

RSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a penetração intratubular do Bio-C Sealer utilizando microscopia confocal de varredura a laser (CLSM). Sessenta caninos foram divididos em quatro grupos (n = 15): Bio-C Sealer, Endo Sequence BC Sealer, Sealer Plus BC e AH Plus. Três discos de 1 mm de espessura foram obtidos de cada amostra e analisados para determinar a área e profundidade máxima de penetração dos cimentos. O Bio-C Sealer apresentou penetração máxima no terço cervical e médio, inferior ao AH Plus (p < 0,05), mas semelhante aos demais cimentos de silicato de cálcio avaliados (p > 0,05). Nos terços apicais não houve diferença entre os cimentos (p > 0,05). A área de penetração do Bio-C Sealer foi semelhante ao AH Plus e aos selantes de silicato de cálcio (p > 0,05). Assim, pode-se concluir que o Bio-C Sealer teve penetração intratubular semelhante aos demais cimentos testados, podendo ser utilizado como cimento endodôntico.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Avaliação da penetração intratubular do Bio-C Sealer: um cimento à base de silicato de cálcio

Pelisser¹,

Matoso²,

Kirchhoff³

et al. 2022

RSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hydraulic calcium silicate-based sealers were reported to have comparable flowability to epoxy resin-based sealers, but the film thickness was higher in the former (Khalil et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2017;Zhou et al, 2013). No significant differences were also reported in the penetration depth of these sealers within the dentinal tubules (De Bem et al, 2020;Eid et al, 2021;Gunes et al, 2019;Reynolds et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2018). Other studies, however, reported conflicting results of lower (Chen et al, 2017;Kim et al, 2019;Yang et al, 2021) or higher (Akcay et al, 2016;Türker et al, 2018) penetration of hydraulic cement sealers in comparison with epoxy resin-based sealers.…”

Section: Flow and Tubular Penetrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Present status and future directions: Hydraulic materials for endodontic use

Camilleri

Atmeh

et al. 2022

Int Endodontic J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Hydraulic materials are used in Endodontics due to their hydration characteristics namely the formation of calcium hydroxide when mixing with water and also because of their hydraulic properties. These materials are presented in various consistencies and delivery methods. They are composed primarily of tricalcium and dicalcium silicate, and also include a radiopacifier, additives and an aqueous or a non‐aqueous vehicle. Only materials whose primary reaction is with water can be classified as hydraulic. Objectives Review of the classification of hydraulic materials by Camilleri and the literature pertaining to specific uses of hydraulic cements in endodontics namely intra‐coronal, intra‐radicular and extra‐radicular. Review of the literature on the material properties linked to specific uses providing the current status of these materials after which future trends and gaps in knowledge could be identified. Methods The literature was reviewed using PUBMED, and for each clinical use, the in vitro properties such as physical, chemical, biological and antimicrobial characteristics and clinical data were extracted and evaluated. Results A large number of publications were retrieved for each clinical use and these were grouped depending on the property type being investigated. Conclusions The hydraulic cements have made a difference in clinical outcomes. The main shortcoming is the poor testing methodologies employed which provide very limited information and also inhibits adequate clinical translation. Furthermore, the clinical protocols need to be updated to enable the materials to be employed effectively.

show abstract

“…The obtained results presented statistically significant differences in some testing conditions, supporting the n in each group was sufficient. Comparison between the different root thirds (apical, middle and coronal) provided essential information regarding the different anatomical characteristics and material behavior in each area, as explored in several papers [28][29][30][31]. In this study, we focused on the apical and middle thirds, since the sealer penetration in these areas is fundamental to the success of endodontic treatment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Different Irrigation Solutions on the Diffusion of MTA Cement into the Root Canal Dentin

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) Aim: This study aims to analyze the in vitro infiltration of a silicate root canal sealer into dentinal tubules after using different endodontic irrigating solutions. (2) Methods: Twenty-nine teeth with single roots were separated into three groups according to the final irrigation protocol: G1 n = 10) = 17% EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) + 3.0% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), G2 (n = 10) = 17% EDTA + 2.0% chlorhexidine and G3 (Control group, n = 9) = 17% EDTA + saline solution. Root canals were filled using cold lateral compaction technique with MTA Fillapex sealer and gutta-percha. The sealer was labeled with rhodamine B. The teeth were segmented at the middle and third apical sections, which were visualized using 10× confocal laser microscopy to determine the sealer penetration percentage. (3) Results: In the apical section, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups regarding sealer penetration. In the middle section, Group 1 obtained the highest percentage, and Group 2 the lowest (p = 0.004). Group 1 also presented statistically significant differences in the Control Group (p = 0.031) and had close sealer penetration values. Meanwhile, the Control Group (p = 0.023) and Group 2 (p = 0.029) revealed a significant decrease of sealer penetration between the apical and middle sections. (4) Conclusion: The obtained results support that final irrigation with NaOCl promoted similar sealer penetration in the apical and middle sections. On the other hand, a significant decrease in the sealer penetration of the middle section was observed for the chlorhexidine and saline groups. Compared to other irrigant solutions, NaOCl promotes more uniform sealer penetration, which can correlate with better sealing and, consequently, higher endodontic treatment success.

show abstract

Effect of Ultrasonic Activation of Endodontic Sealers on Intratubular Penetration and Bond Strength to Root Dentin

Cited by 27 publications

References 36 publications

Avaliação da penetração intratubular do Bio-C Sealer: um cimento à base de silicato de cálcio

Avaliação da penetração intratubular do Bio-C Sealer: um cimento à base de silicato de cálcio

Present status and future directions: Hydraulic materials for endodontic use

Effect of Different Irrigation Solutions on the Diffusion of MTA Cement into the Root Canal Dentin

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About