2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2010.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ultrasound treatment on properties of gluten-based film

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
33
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A droplet of distilled water (4 μL) was deposited on the leveled film surface to determine the contact angle of water on the biopolymer films. All films were pre-conditioned in a humidity chamber at 50% ± 2% relative humidity to avoid interference due to competing moisture exchange at the surface around the droplet (Marcuzzo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Film Surface Wettability/contact Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A droplet of distilled water (4 μL) was deposited on the leveled film surface to determine the contact angle of water on the biopolymer films. All films were pre-conditioned in a humidity chamber at 50% ± 2% relative humidity to avoid interference due to competing moisture exchange at the surface around the droplet (Marcuzzo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Film Surface Wettability/contact Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu, Tellez-Garay, and Castell-Perez (2004) investigated the effect of US on the characteristics of peanut protein-based films and observed that the mechanical properties varied depending on the treatment duration. Marcuzzo et al (2010) found that US improved protein dispersion and final appearance of gluten-based films; sonication also promoted hydrophilic surface properties. Nevertheless, there is no information about the application of ultrasound-treated protein edible coatings to a real food product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…They are used in the extraction of enzymes and proteins, induction of oxidation/reduction reactions, emulsification, meat tenderization, sterilisation, etc. (Marcuzzo, Perssini, Debeaufort, & Sensidoni, 2010). Cavitation (formation and violent collapse of bubbles) is the main process responsible for the effects of ultrasound on food components, although other mechanical, physical and chemical effects are detected, such as heating, shear stress, turbulence and generation of radicals (Chandrapala, Zisu, Palmer, Kentish, & Ashokkumar, 2011;Villamiel & de Jong, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If sonication time and intensity had more increase, the polymer and its chemical bonds would be probably decomposed and adversely affect mechanical properties, like what was seen at 75 min of sonication time. Several researchers have evaluated the effect of ultrasound radiation on different film properties and observed that tensile strength is improved, while different results are obtained about elongation [14,15,31].…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%