46th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-4344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Upsweep Angle on Afterbody Vortices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current analysis was performed using a MATLAB ® code that employs the method of snapshots 24,25 . The POD modes of the baseline case have been extensively discussed in previous studies 9 which revealed the dominant m = 1 helical displacement mode at the trailing-edge for the fully developed afterbody vortex. This same m = 1 mode had previously been identified with wing tip vortices 26,27 , delta wing vortices 28 and inlet vortices 29 .…”
Section: E Proper Orthogonal Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The current analysis was performed using a MATLAB ® code that employs the method of snapshots 24,25 . The POD modes of the baseline case have been extensively discussed in previous studies 9 which revealed the dominant m = 1 helical displacement mode at the trailing-edge for the fully developed afterbody vortex. This same m = 1 mode had previously been identified with wing tip vortices 26,27 , delta wing vortices 28 and inlet vortices 29 .…”
Section: E Proper Orthogonal Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This vortex footprint is the reason for the vortex drag since it represents the lowest pressures acting on the upsweep surface due to the vortex. Further discussions about the same baseline flowfield has been published previously 9 . For the spoiler placed at x′s /c = 2.5% ( Fig.…”
Section: Particle Image Velocimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations