2014
DOI: 10.1134/s2075113314030137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of vacuum ultraviolet on the surface properties of high-filled polymer composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These conditions include deep vacuum, a sharp temperature drop (from −170 to +200 °C), ionizing radiation, vacuum ultraviolet radiation, micrometeorite particles, atomic oxygen, etc. Under the influence of these conditions, many polymers are destroyed, which leads to a serious violation of their functionalities [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions include deep vacuum, a sharp temperature drop (from −170 to +200 °C), ionizing radiation, vacuum ultraviolet radiation, micrometeorite particles, atomic oxygen, etc. Under the influence of these conditions, many polymers are destroyed, which leads to a serious violation of their functionalities [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the abovementioned applications of such systems, it is of great interest to study the properties of the composite polymeric materials filled with them. For example, treatment with vacuum ultraviolet (λ = 90-115 nm) of a polymer composite based on high-impact polystyrene and organosiloxane filler increases the solar radiation absorption by ∼15%, which was noted in the corresponding study [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Zeiler et al [20] used an atomic force microscope to measure the roughness of each surface post-treatment and they attributed to an increased roughness a larger bonding area and better conditions for mechanical interlocking. Similar experiments detailed in [23] and [24] used vacuum UV treatment rather than excimer lasers and found that the treatment caused the surface to flatten and smoothen on a microscale. The above papers suggest that the surface topography is not affecting the increase in bonding strength and indicates that it is the secondary effect on chemical bonds that have the largest impact [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%