“…Thus, Krell et al(1976), Brink et a1 (1981), Saad & Burka (1983), Turner et al (1983) and Mansour & Daniel (1987) found no increase of responsiveness or sensitivity to agonists in sensitized tissues which is in contrast with the results from the present study. This discrepancy may be explicable in a number of ways such as the different animal species or strain used, the sensitization procedure (differences in the antigen and coadjuvant used, route of administration, time elapsed between sensitization and death of the animal, resensitization, challenge with antigen before testing the agonists), the additional supply of ascorbic acid in the diet of animals (Hitchcock 1980), the tissue preparation (type of strip mounted in the organ bath, presence or absence of intact epithelium, size of loading tension imposed to the tissue), and the type of recording (isometric vs isotonic, etc.) Notwithstanding, other authors The characteristics of the hyperresponsiveness observed in the present study closely resemble those reported for the reserpine-induced supersensitivity in rabbit aorta (Kalsner 1974) which has been associated with an enhanced ability of the tissue to retain and utilize calcium (Carrier & Hester 1976;Krishnamurty & Mukherjee 1981).…”