Veal calves are at a high risk of disease early in life which can lead to poor growth.Research is needed to determine interventions that can reduce disease and promote the growth of veal calves. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of fatty acid supplementation (NeoTec5g ® , Provimi) and the provision of a dry teat on calf growth, as well as incidence of bovine respiratory disease (BRD), navel inflammation, and diarrhea.A total of 240 Holstein bull calves from 2 cohorts were randomly assigned to 4 treatments using a 2x2 factorial arrangement (n=60/treatment): control, NeoTec5g, Teat, and NeoTec5g+Teat upon arrival to a commercial veal facility (d 0). Calves were housed in individual pens from 0 to 9 wk and then paired by treatment at wk 9. Milk replacer (MR) was fed twice daily using a proprietary step-up program. NeoTec5g was added to MR at a feeding rate of 0.5g/kg of BW/hd/day for NeoTec5g and NeoTec5g+Teat groups. Body weight (BW) and body condition score (BCS) were recorded at wk 0, 5, and 10. Average daily gain (ADG) was calculated for wk 1 to 5, wk 5 to 10 and wk 1 to 10. Health exams were conducted twice weekly for 6 wk to diagnose BRD, navel inflammation and diarrhea. BW and BCS were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVAs. ADG was analyzed using a generalized linear model. Health data were analyzed using logistic regression (PROC GENMOD in SAS). Health data are reported as relative risk (RR). There was no effect of NeoTec5g, Teat or their interaction on BW or BCS. There was no effect of NeoTec5g on ADG wk 1 to 5, wk 5 to 10, or wk 1 to 10.iii There was a tendency for Teat to decrease ADG from wk 1 to 5 (P = 0.050), but not from wk 5 to 10 or wk 1 to 10. There was a tendency for the interaction of NeoTec5g and Teat (P = 0.099), whereby calves with both factors (NeoTec5g+Teat) had the lowest ADG for wk 1 to 5, but not for wk 5 to10 and wk 1 to 10. There was no effect of NeoTec5g, Teat nor their interaction on the risk of BRD, diarrhea or navel inflammation. We saw no effect of our interventions on calf health or growth. More research is needed to determine if other factors, such as failure of passive transfer, poor ventilation, and low milk allowance in the first few weeks after arrival may have impacted the efficacy of our interventions.iv
DedicationTo Mr. Farrell, Jim Quigley, Tana Dennis, Bob Hostetler and Katy Proudfoot for helping me fall in love with science, find my passion for calves, and discover that I am capable of far greater things when I get to work with friends.